Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;22(3):495-510.
doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09607-z. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Epigenetic regulation of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors in neuroendocrine tumors and other types of cancer

Affiliations
Review

Epigenetic regulation of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors in neuroendocrine tumors and other types of cancer

M J Klomp et al. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Both somatostatin (SST) and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are proteins with important functions in both physiological tissue and in tumors, particularly in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). NETs are frequently characterized by high SSTRs expression levels. SST analogues (SSAs) that bind and activate SSTR have anti-proliferative and anti-secretory activity, thereby reducing both the growth as well as the hormonal symptoms of NETs. Moreover, the high expression levels of SSTR type-2 (SSTR2) in NETs is a powerful target for therapy with radiolabeled SSAs. Due to the important role of both SST and SSTRs, it is of great importance to elucidate the mechanisms involved in regulating their expression in NETs, as well as in other types of tumors. The field of epigenetics recently gained interest in NET research, highlighting the importance of this process in regulating the expression of gene and protein expression. In this review we will discuss the role of the epigenetic machinery in controlling the expression of both SSTRs and the neuropeptide SST. Particular attention will be given to the epigenetic regulation of these proteins in NETs, whereas the involvement of the epigenetic machinery in other types of cancer will be discussed as well. In addition, we will discuss the possibility to target enzymes involved in the epigenetic machinery to modify the expression of the SST-system, thereby possibly improving therapeutic options.

Keywords: Cancer; Epigenetic regulation; Neuroendocrine tumors; Somatostatin; Somatostatin receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Upon binding of SST or SSAs, (1,2) K+ channels are activated and Ca2+ channels are inhibited, resulting in decreased Ca2+ levels, and (3) adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity is inhibited thereby reducing intracellular cAMP levels. This results in inhibition of hormone secretion. (b) Activation of the SST-system also results in anti-tumoral activity: (1) SHP-1 is activated, thereby increasing pro-apoptotic and reducing anti-apoptotic proteins, and (2) SHP-2 is activated which results in activation of PTPη by Src-mediated phosphorylation. PTPη causes inhibition of pathways physiologically involved in cell proliferation. In both figure a and b, effects induced by SSTR activation are indicated by green (enhanced) or red (reduced) arrows
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Epigenetic modifications can modify both DNA and histones. DNA methylation and inactivating histone methylation stimulate heterochromatin, resulting in inaccessible DNA and therefore no gene transcription. Histone acetylation and activating histone methylation stimulate euchromatin, thereby stimulating gene transcription. Histone methylation can therefore both be inactivating and activating, depending on which lysine residue is modified on which histone. Examples of inactivating histone methylation marks (indicated in red) are H3K9me2/3, H3K27me2/3 and H4K20me3, and activating histone methylation marks (indicated in green) are H3K4me2/3, H2K36me3 and H3K79me3. All epigenetic modifications are catalyzed by enzymes: (1) DNA methylation by DNMTs, (2) histone methylation marks by HMTs and HDMs, and (3) histone acetylation marks by HATs and HDACs. (b) DNMTs are involved in DNA methylation in which cytosine residues are converted into 5-methylcytosine residues. (c,d) Epigenetic drugs have been developed inhibiting certain groups of enzymes involved in epigenetic modifications, i.e. DNMTis and HDACis targeting DNMTs and HDACs, respectively, both stimulating transcriptionally active euchromatin. (e) HDACis often target multiple HDACs within HDAC class I, IIa and/or IIb. AB3, entinostat (ENT), tacedinaline (TAC), thailandepsin-A (TDP-A) and valproic acid (VPA) target HDAC1, 2 and 3; romidepsin (FK228) targets all HDAC protein within class I; LMK235 targets HDAC4 and 5 within class IIa; vorinostat (SAHA) and trichostatin A (TSA) target HDAC proteins within class I, IIa and IIb. [, –106]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Activating histone marks (indicated in green) stimulate euchromatin, resulting in more gene transcription. Epigenetic drugs may be used to stimulate euchromatin, in order to increase the expression of certain proteins. Thereby, it may be possible to increase the expression of targets for therapy, e.g. SSTR2 in NET patients with insufficient expression levels for treatment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Olias G, Viollet C, Kusserow H, Epelbaum J, Meyerhof W. Regulation and function of somatostatin receptors. J Neurochem. 2004;89:1057–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02402.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnett P. Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor physiology. Endocrine. 2003;20:255–264. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:20:3:255. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel YC. Somatostatin and its receptor family. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1999;20:157–198. doi: 10.1006/frne.1999.0183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Günther T, Tulipano G, Dournaud P, Bousquet C, Csaba Z, Kreienkamp H-J, Lupp A, Korbonits M, Castaño JP, Wester HJ, Culler M, Melmed S, Schulz S. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin receptors: structure, function, ligands, and new nomenclature. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70:763–835. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.015388. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gatto F, Barbieri F, Arvigo M, Thellung S, Amaru J, Albertelli M, et al. Biological and biochemical basis of the differential efficacy of first and second generation Somatostatin receptor ligands in neuroendocrine neoplasms. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3940. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163940. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources