Molecular basis of serological weak D phenotypes and RhD typing discrepancies identified in the Korean population
- PMID: 33085596
- PMCID: PMC8297674
- DOI: 10.2450/2020.0128-20
Molecular basis of serological weak D phenotypes and RhD typing discrepancies identified in the Korean population
Abstract
Background: The molecular basis of RhD blood groups differs with race/ethnicity. This study aimed to investigate the molecular basis of serological weak D phenotypes and RhD typing discrepancies in the Korean population.
Materials and methods: The RhD status of 188,852 Korean patients was initially determined using the automated microplate method and manual tile method. In case of no agglutination, weak D testing was further performed using the tube and gel methods. Serologically D-negative samples with C+ and/or E+ were tested using polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primers for four RHD targets and/or exon 9 sequencing. Samples showing a serological weak D phenotype or an RhD typing discrepancy were subjected to full RHD gene sequencing.
Results: Of the 32 samples showing a serological weak D phenotype and 191 samples showing a serologically D-negative phenotype with C+ and/or E+, 23 and 50 were genotyped, respectively. Among the weak D samples, the most common alleles were RHD*15 (n=6), RHD*13.01 (n=4), and RHD*01W.25 (n=4), and no variant was found in two samples. RHD*01EL.01 (n=26) accounted for more than half of the D-negative samples. Of the seven samples that were typed as D-positive using the automated microplate method but showed weak reactivity using the tile method, four were genotyped, and the results were as follows: RHD*01W.33 (n=2), RHD*01W.43 (n=1), and no variant found (n=1).
Discussion: In our cohort, various D variant alleles including RHD*15 were identified; however, RHD*01W.1, RHD*01W.2, RHD*01W.3, RHD*09.03.01, and RHD*09.04, accounting for more than 95% of Caucasians with a serological weak D phenotype, were not found. Our study reaffirms that the distribution of D variant alleles differs between East Asians and Caucasians. Our findings also indicate that some D variants including RHD*01W.33 and RHD*01W.43 are at risk of being mistyped as D-positive by a highly sensitive RhD typing method such as an automated microplate method.
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Serological profiling and molecular characterization of D variants in Chengdu blood donors.Transfus Clin Biol. 2025 Aug;32(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2025.06.002. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Transfus Clin Biol. 2025. PMID: 40516751
-
Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.Immunohematology. 2024 Dec 31;40(4):159-165. doi: 10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022. Print 2024 Dec 1. Immunohematology. 2024. PMID: 39740012
-
Characterization of RHD alleles present in serologically RHD-negative donors determined by a sensitive microplate technique.Vox Sang. 2019 Nov;114(8):869-875. doi: 10.1111/vox.12851. Epub 2019 Oct 6. Vox Sang. 2019. PMID: 31587310
-
Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(1):10-19. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14757. Epub 2017 May 16. Br J Haematol. 2017. PMID: 28508413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DEL in China: the D antigen among serologic RhD-negative individuals.J Transl Med. 2021 Oct 20;19(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03116-6. J Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34670559 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Guide to Rho(D) Immune Globulin in Women With Molecularly Defined Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A).Ann Lab Med. 2024 Jul 1;44(4):307-313. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0356. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Ann Lab Med. 2024. PMID: 38384203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proceed with care: the "uncommon" serologic weak D phenotypes.Blood Transfus. 2021 Jul;19(4):272-276. doi: 10.2450/2021.0147-21. Blood Transfus. 2021. PMID: 34704554 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Transfusion support in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Blood Res. 2023 Apr 30;58(S1):S1-S7. doi: 10.5045/br.2023.2023004. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Blood Res. 2023. PMID: 36843378 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Frohn C, Dumbgen L, Brand JM, et al. Probability of anti-D development in D-patients receiving D+ RBCs. Transfusion. 2003;43:893–8. - PubMed
-
- Yazer MH, Triulzi DJ. Detection of anti-D in D− recipients transfused with D+ red blood cells. Transfusion. 2007;47:2197–201. - PubMed
-
- Gonzalez-Porras JR, Graciani IF, Perez-Simon JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of a transfusion policy of D+ red blood cells into D− patients. Transfusion. 2008;48:1318–24. - PubMed
-
- Avent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. Blood. 2000;95:375–87. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources