Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0239778.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239778. eCollection 2020.

The hunger-obesity paradox: Exploring food banking system characteristics and obesity inequities among food-insecure pantry clients

Kristen Cooksey Stowers  1   2 , Nana Yaa A Marfo  3 , Eminet Abebe Gurganus  4 , Kim M Gans  2   4 , Shiriki K Kumanyika  5 , Marlene B Schwartz  2   4
Affiliations

The hunger-obesity paradox: Exploring food banking system characteristics and obesity inequities among food-insecure pantry clients

Kristen Cooksey Stowers et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: Heightened obesity risk among food-insecure food pantry clients is a health equity issue because the co-occurrence of obesity and hunger is deeply-rooted in systematic social disadvantage and historical oppression. This qualitative study examined key stakeholders' perspectives of the relationship between the U.S. food banking system and obesity disparities among food insecure clients.

Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 10 key stakeholders (e.g., food bank director, food bank board member, advocate) who are familiar with food bank operations. Data were transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo [v11], and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Multiple themes emerged drawing linkages between structural characteristics of the food banking system and disparities in the dual burden of food insecurity and obesity: [a] access to unhealthy food from donors; [b] federal emergency food policy and programming; [c] state-level emergency food policy and programming; [d] geography-based risk profiles; and [e] inadequate food supply versus client need. Interviewees also identified social challenges between system leaders and clients that maintain disparities in obesity risk among individuals with very low food security including: [a] media representation and stereotypes about food pantry clients; [b] mistrust in communities of color; [c] lack of inclusion/representation among food bank system leaders; and [d] access to information.

Conclusion: Future efforts to alleviate obesity inequities among clients chronically burdened by food insecurity, especially among certain subpopulations of clients, should prioritize policy, systems, and environmental strategies to overcome these structural and social challenges within the food banking system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. United States Department of Agriculture. Interactive Charts and Highlights [Internet]. Food Security in the U.S. 2019. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-...
    1. Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt MP, Gregory C, Singh A. Statistical supplement to household food security in the United States in 2014 In: US Household Food Security: Statistics and Analysis for 2014. AP-077, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2016. p. 57–92.
    1. Anderson SA. Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations. J Nutr. 1990;120(suppl_11):1555–600. - PubMed
    1. Wolfson JA, Leung CW. Food Insecurity and COVID-19: Disparities in Early Effects for US Adults. Nutrients. 2020. June;12(6):1648. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: Solving the weight of the nation. Glickman D, Parker L, Sim LJ, del Valle Cook H, Miller EA, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. - PubMed

Publication types