Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020:17:30.
doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Current trend of accreditation within medical education

Affiliations
Review

Current trend of accreditation within medical education

Ducksun Ahn. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020.

Abstract

Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME also actively spearheaded a project to recognize accrediting agencies within individual countries. The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME), with the 2 key concepts of entrusted professional activity and milestones, has enabled researchers to identify the relationships between patient outcomes and medical education. The recent data-driven approach to CBME has been used for ongoing quality improvement of trainees and training programs. The accreditation goal has shifted from the single purpose of quality assurance to balancing quality assurance and quality improvement. Although there are many types of postgraduate medical education (PGME), it may be possible to accredit resident programs on a global scale by adopting the concept of CBME. It will also be possible to achieve accreditation alignment for BME and PGME, which center on competency. This approach may also make it possible to measure accreditation outcomes against patient outcomes. Therefore, evidence of the advantages of costly and labor-consuming accreditation processes will be available soon, and quality improvement will be the driving force of the accreditation process.

Keywords: Accreditation; Goals; Medical education; Quality improvement; Training support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030.
    1. World Federation for Medical Education . Ferney-Voltaire (France): World Federation for Medical Education; 2016. World directory of medical schools. [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: http://www.wdoms.org.
    1. Ferney-Voltaire (France): World Federation for Medical Education; World Federation for Medical Education [Internet] [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: http://wfme.org.
    1. Karle H. Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME. Acad Med. 2006;81(12 Suppl):S43–S48. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barzansky B. Washington (DC): Liaison Committee on Medical Education; 2019. Overview of the self-study process: Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine [Internet] [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://medicine.musc.edu/about/lcme-reaccreditation.

LinkOut - more resources