Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e563-e570.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004454. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

Acellular Dermal Matrix Provides Durable Long-Term Outcomes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Study of Patients with Over 60 Months of Follow-up

Affiliations

Acellular Dermal Matrix Provides Durable Long-Term Outcomes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Study of Patients with Over 60 Months of Follow-up

Malke Asaad et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in the United States, but studies assessing the long-term outcomes of VHR using biologic mesh are scarce.

Objective: We sought to determine the rates of hernia recurrence (HR) and surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in a large cohort of patients who underwent AWR with biologic mesh.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent AWR using either porcine ADM (PADM) or bovine ADM (BADM) from 2005 to 2019. We analyzed the full cohort and a subset of our population with minimum long-term follow-up (LTF) of 5 years. The primary outcome measure was HR. Secondary outcomes were SSOs.

Results: We identified a total of 725 AWRs (49.5% PADM, 50.5% BADM). Mean age was 69 ± 11.5 years and mean body mass index was 31 ± 7 kg/m 2 . Forty-two percent of the defects were clean at the time of AWR, 44% were clean-contaminated, and 14% were contaminated/infected. Mean defect size was 180 ± 174 cm 2 , mean mesh size was 414 ± 203 cm 2 . Hernia recurred in 93 patients (13%), with cumulative HR rates of 4.9%, 13.5%, 17.3%, and 18.8% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively. There were no differences in HR ( P = 0.83) and SSO ( P = 0.87) between the 2 mesh types. SSOs were identified in 27% of patients. In our LTF group (n = 162), the HR rate was 16%. Obesity, bridged repair, and concurrent stoma presence/creation were independent predictors of HR; component separation was protective against HR.

Conclusions: Despite its use in complex AWR, ADM provides durable long-term outcomes with relatively low recurrence rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK, et al. Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4104–4112.
    1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16:179–183.
    1. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–583. discussion 583–585.
    1. Finan KR, Kilgore ML, Hawn MT. Open suture versus mesh repair of primary incisional hernias: a cost-utility analysis. Hernia. 2009;13:173–182.
    1. Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, et al. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2011;253:16–26.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources