Preliminary Exploration of Swine Veterinarian Perspectives of On-Farm Euthanasia
- PMID: 33086607
- PMCID: PMC7650797
- DOI: 10.3390/ani10101919
Preliminary Exploration of Swine Veterinarian Perspectives of On-Farm Euthanasia
Abstract
Euthanasia is a critical component in swine production and veterinarians play an important role in euthanasia protocol development and training. This study aimed to understand veterinarian involvement in and perspectives on euthanasia on pig farms. An online survey was disseminated both at a pig welfare conference and online via a veterinarian e-newsletter. Twenty-five veterinarians participated in the survey. The majority of respondents indicated that caretakers are the individuals making euthanasia decisions and performing the task (n = 17, 68% and 22, 88%, respectively). The majority (22, 88%) of respondents indicated that most of the facilities with which they work have a written euthanasia protocol, and 72% (18) indicated that they assisted in protocol development. Only half of respondents (13, 52%) agreed that "all employees performing euthanasia have been trained adequately", and 80% (20) identified an interest in delivering more training. Less than half the respondents indicated that strategies for coping with "personal stress" and "emotional wellness" (12, 48%) were included in euthanasia training. While the moral stress of performing euthanasia is recognized, there is opportunity for addressing mental well-being in euthanasia resources. Although preliminary, this study supports the need for further euthanasia training on-farm, involving veterinarians in the process.
Keywords: caretakers; euthanasia; mental well-being; moral stress; pigs; training; veterinarians.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Mullins C.R., Pairis-Garcia M.D., George K.A., Anthony R., Johnson A.K., Coleman G.J., Rault J.-L., Millman S.T. Determination of swine euthanasia criteria and analysis of barriers to euthanasia in the United States using expert opinion. Anim. Welf. 2017;26:449–459. doi: 10.7120/09627286.26.4.449. - DOI
-
- Wagner B.K., Cramer M.C., Fowler H.N., Varnell H.L., Dietsch A.M., Proudfoot K.L., Shearer J., Correa M., Pairis-Garcia M.D. Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: Dairy Producer Surveys and Focus Groups. Animals. 2020;10:770. doi: 10.3390/ani10050770. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Leary S., Underwood W., Anthony R., Cartner S., Grandin T., Greenacre C.B., Gwaltney-Bran S., McCrackin M.A., Meyer R., Miller D., et al. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition. American Veterinary Medical Association; Schaumburg, IL, USA: 2020.
-
- National Pork Board (NPB) and the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) On-Farm Euthanasia of Swine: Recommendations for the Producer. [(accessed on 26 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.aasv.org/documents/2016EuthRec-EN.pdf.
-
- Arluke A., Sanders C.R. Regarding Animals. Temple University Press; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1996. The institutional self of shelter workers; pp. 82–106.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources