Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda
- PMID: 33086720
- PMCID: PMC7589873
- DOI: 10.3390/foods9101495
Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda
Abstract
This review aims to tackle the challenge of understanding how visual design cues can affect behavioural outcomes in a food context. The review answers two key questions: (1) What are the effects of the most important visual design cues on behavioural outcomes and how can they be explained? (2) What are the research gaps in this area? We start from a comprehensive taxonomy of visual design cues delineating the most important visual design cues. Next, we evaluate the extant research based on a structured, narrative literature review on visual design cues in the food domain. We differentiate between object processed and spatially processed visual design cues in food choice contexts and show how they affect behavioural outcomes through a range of psychological processes (attention, affective-, cognitive- and motivational reactions, food perceptions and attitudes). We end with recommendations which take into account the current food store context, the state-of-art in measuring psychological processes and behavioural outcomes and the specific food-, person- and context-related moderators. This review offers guidance for research to untangle the complexity of the effect of visual design cues in a food choice context.
Keywords: attitudes; behaviour; food choice; food perception; healthy; point of purchase; psychological processes; quality; sustainable; taste; visual cue.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Healthy Food Identification: Food Cues and Claims Affect Speeded and Thoughtful Evaluations of Food.Health Commun. 2019 Jun;34(7):735-746. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1434734. Epub 2018 Feb 6. Health Commun. 2019. PMID: 29405772
-
Sensorial Hierarchy in Octopus vulgaris's Food Choice: Chemical vs. Visual.Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 10;10(3):457. doi: 10.3390/ani10030457. Animals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32164232 Free PMC article.
-
See it, grab it, or STOP! Relationships between trait impulsivity, attentional bias for pictorial food cues and associated response inhibition following in-vivo food cue exposure.Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 24. Appetite. 2015. PMID: 25817482
-
Steady-state visual evoked potentials as a research tool in social affective neuroscience.Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1763-1775. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12768. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 27699794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extrinsic information influences taste and flavor perception: a review from psychological and neuroimaging perspectives.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013 Mar;24(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013. PMID: 23182900 Review.
Cited by
-
The Influence of Sensory Characteristics of Game Meat on Consumer Neuroperception: A Narrative Review.Foods. 2023 Mar 22;12(6):1341. doi: 10.3390/foods12061341. Foods. 2023. PMID: 36981266 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Think and Choose! The Dual Impact of Label Information and Consumer Attitudes on the Choice of a Plant-Based Analog.Foods. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):2269. doi: 10.3390/foods13142269. Foods. 2024. PMID: 39063353 Free PMC article.
-
Unpacking the Influence of Visual Density on Pizza Packaging: Sensory Expectations and Purchase Intentions.Foods. 2024 Aug 17;13(16):2567. doi: 10.3390/foods13162567. Foods. 2024. PMID: 39200494 Free PMC article.
-
Food packaging solutions in the post-per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and microplastics era: A review of functions, materials, and bio-based alternatives.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025 Jan;24(1):e70079. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70079. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025. PMID: 39680570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Impact of Responsible Food Packaging Perceptions on Naturalness and Healthiness Inferences, and Consumer Buying Intentions.Foods. 2021 Oct 5;10(10):2366. doi: 10.3390/foods10102366. Foods. 2021. PMID: 34681415 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bell D.R., Corsten D., Knox G. From point of purchase to path to purchase: How preshopping factors drive unplanned buying. J. Mark. 2011;75:31–45. doi: 10.1509/jm.75.1.31. - DOI
-
- Cameron A.J., Charlton E., Ngan W.W., Sacks G. A systematic review of the effectiveness of supermarket-based interventions involving product, promotion, or place on the healthiness of consumer purchases. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2016;5:129–138. doi: 10.1007/s13668-016-0172-8. - DOI
-
- Hoyer W.D. An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. J. Consum. Res. 1984;11:822–829. doi: 10.1086/209017. - DOI
-
- Suher J., Hoyer W.D. The moderating effect of buying impulsivity on the dynamics of unplanned purchasing motivations. J. Mark. Res. 2020;57:548–564. doi: 10.1177/0022243720912284. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources