Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;82(3):500-522.
doi: 10.1177/0030222820966928. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Bereavement in Times of COVID-19: A Review and Theoretical Framework

Affiliations
Review

Bereavement in Times of COVID-19: A Review and Theoretical Framework

Margaret Stroebe et al. Omega (Westport). 2021 Feb.

Abstract

A review of the literature on adaptation to bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted to assess the current state of knowledge. Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 outbreak. 44 articles were included in the review. Narrative synthesis showed that knowledge was largely based on expert assessments of prior bereavement research and professional experience; there is so far absence of empirical evidence linking features of COVID-19 bereavement situations to health outcomes. Severe negative consequences have been consistently predicted by authors. There is still relatively little consideration of positive or compensatory processes or the possibility that these could alleviate the effect of the shocking, traumatic circumstances. With two notable exceptions, there has been lack of attention to the role of theoretical models for guiding research and practice. A theoretical perspective (the Dual Process Model, DPM) was applied to the information derived from the available articles. Two features of the DPM framework illustrated its relevance: 1. It enables systematic assessment of the range of loss- and restoration-related challenges for the bereaved; 2. It speaks for extension of psychotherapeutic intervention to manage secondary, restoration- as well as primary, loss-oriented stressors; studies have demonstrated that this may increase the effectiveness of intervention. Directions for future research and DPM application are suggested.

Keywords: COVID-19; bereavement; dual process model; grief; health; pandemic; review; theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement Stroebe & Schut 1999).

References

    1. References marked with asterisks are included in the review.
    1. *Abel J., Taubert M. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic: Compassionate communities and information technology. Supportive and Palliative Care. 10(4), 369–371. - PubMed
    1. *Aguiar A., Pinto M., Duarte R. (2020). Grief and mourning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal. Acta Médica Portuguesa, 33(9), 543–545. 10.20344/amp.14345 - DOI - PubMed
    1. *Ahmadi K., Ramezani M. A. (2020). Iranian emotional experience and expression during the COVID-19 crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 32(5), 285–286. 10.1177/10105395209237097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. *Bertuccio R. F., Runion M. C. (2020). Considering grief in mental health outcomes of COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S87–S89. https://doi.org/10.1037tra0000723 - PubMed