Impact of Intraoperative 3-Tesla MRI on Endonasal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection and a Proposed New Scoring System for Predicting the Utility of Intraoperative MRI
- PMID: 33087635
- PMCID: PMC7788269
- DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0060
Impact of Intraoperative 3-Tesla MRI on Endonasal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection and a Proposed New Scoring System for Predicting the Utility of Intraoperative MRI
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 3-Tesla intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging (3T-iMRI) for pituitary adenoma resection, and to propose a new scoring system for predicting the utility of 3T-iMRI. This retrospective study evaluated 82 patients with pituitary adenoma who underwent purely endoscopic endonasal resection with 3T-iMRI between 2015 and 2019. 3T-iMRI revealed unexpected residual tumor in 39 cases (47.6%), which led to further resection and contributed to upgrading of the resection level in 28 cases (34.1%), which led to gross total resection rates (GTRs) of 67.1% and near total resection of 15.9%. To construct a new scoring system, patients were divided into a discovery cohort (56 patients) and a validation cohort (26 patients). Three variables for the scoring system were selected according to a univariate analysis of the discovery cohort: the size of the tumor (>20 mm: 1 point), the presence of suprasellar tumor lobulation (1 point) and the history of previous operations (1 point). The risk of additional resection after iMRI was well stratified by this scoring system (range 0-3; p = 0.0037 for trend). Robustness of the system was confirmed in the validation cohort (0 points, 0%; 1 point, 30.8%; 2 points, 70.0%; 3 points, 100%; p = 0.0116 for trend). These results indicate that 3T-iMRI optimized the extent of resection, even with the use of an endoscope, and that the proposed scoring system is useful for predicting whether 3T-iMRI is likely to be of value for a particular patient.
Keywords: Knosp grade; intraoperative MRI; pituitary score; pituitary surgery; transsphenoidal surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Pituitary surgery and volumetric assessment of extent of resection: a paradigm shift in the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging.Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Mar;40(3):E17. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.FOCUS15564. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. PMID: 26926057
-
Ten years' experience with intraoperative MRI-assisted transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Jun;48(6):E14. doi: 10.3171/2020.3.FOCUS2072. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 32480376
-
Intraoperative MRI in transsphenoidal resection of invasive pituitary macroadenomas.Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep;42(3):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01102-7. Epub 2019 Apr 4. Neurosurg Rev. 2019. PMID: 30949920
-
Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas during transsphenoidal surgery.Pituitary. 2016 Apr;19(2):222-31. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0679-9. Pituitary. 2016. PMID: 26323592 Review.
-
Intra-operative MRI vs endoscopy in achieving gross total resection of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Aug;161(8):1683-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03955-9. Epub 2019 May 28. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019. PMID: 31139934
Cited by
-
Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Mar 1;21(1):148-167. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0116. Epub 2021 Dec 9. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 34880193 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection of suprasellar subarachnoid hemorrhage using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Feb 21;16:57. doi: 10.25259/SNI_921_2024. eCollection 2025. Surg Neurol Int. 2025. PMID: 40041060 Free PMC article.
-
The Value of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma.J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Sep 28;83(6):646-652. doi: 10.1055/a-1924-8166. eCollection 2022 Dec. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022. PMID: 36393881 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al. : Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors’ initial 800 patients. J Neurosurgery 114: 1544–1568, 2011 - PubMed
-
- de Divitiis E, Laws ER, Giani U, Iuliano SL, de Divitiis O, Apuzzo ML: The current status of endoscopy in transsphenoidal surgery: an international survey. World Neurosurg 83: 447–454, 2015 - PubMed
-
- Soneru CP, Riley CA, Hoffman K, Tabaee A, Schwartz TH: Intra-operative MRI vs endoscopy in achieving gross total resection of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161: 1683–1698, 2019 - PubMed
-
- Fahlbusch R, Golby A, Prada F, Zada G: Utility of intraoperative imaging. Neurosurg Focus 40: 1610, 2016 - PubMed