Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 3:7:563.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00563. eCollection 2020.

Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review

Steven C Ricke et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Organic acids continue to receive considerable attention as feed additives for animal production. Most of the emphasis to date has focused on food safety aspects, particularly on lowering the incidence of foodborne pathogens in poultry and other livestock. Several organic acids are currently either being examined or are already being implemented in commercial settings. Among the several organic acids that have been studied extensively, is formic acid. Formic acid has been added to poultry diets as a means to limit Salmonella spp. and other foodborne pathogens both in the feed and potentially in the gastrointestinal tract once consumed. As more becomes known about the efficacy and impact formic acid has on both the host and foodborne pathogens, it is clear that the presence of formic acid can trigger certain pathways in Salmonella spp. This response may become more complex when formic acid enters the gastrointestinal tract and interacts not only with Salmonella spp. that has colonized the gastrointestinal tract but the indigenous microbial community as well. This review will cover current findings and prospects for further research on the poultry microbiome and feeds treated with formic acid.

Keywords: antimicrobial; feed; food animals; foodborne pathogen; formic acid; gastrointestinal tract.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mind map of the topics covered in the current review. Specifically, focusing on the overall goal of describing the historical and current applications of formic acid as a feed amendment for livestock use, the antimicrobial mechanism(s) attributable to formic acid and how its administration impacts animal and poultry health, and potential approaches for improving efficacy.

References

    1. Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poultry Sci. (2005) 84:634–43. 10.1093/ps/84.4.634 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones FT, Ricke SC. Observations on the history of the development of antimicrobials and their use in poultry feeds. Poultry Sci. (2003) 82:613–7. 10.1093/ps/82.4.613 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broom LJ. The sub-inhibitory theory for antibiotic growth promoters. Poultry Sci. (2017) 96:3104–5. 10.3382/ps/pex114 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sørum H, L'Abée-Lund TM. Antibiotic resistance in food-related bacteria- A result of interfering with the global web of bacterial genetics. Int J Food Microbiol. (2002) 78:43–56. 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00241-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Immerseel F, Cauwerts K, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. Feed additives to control Salmonella in feed. World's Poultry Sci J. (2002) 58:501–13. 10.1079/WPS20020036 - DOI