Abusing science
- PMID: 33089075
- PMCID: PMC7566036
- DOI: 10.1096/fba.2020-00054
Abusing science
Abstract
The perversion of science in the interest of ideology and greed is not a new phenomenon, but a public that is largely scientifically illiterate now is besieged by "alternative facts" and well-designed efforts to discredit legitimate science on topics ranging from vaccines to climate change. Here, we examine three topics rooted in biology and biomedicine-creationism, harms from tobacco, and opioid addiction-to show that those purveying misinformation employ a consistent pattern of intellectual dishonesty to delegitimize science that challenges their ideological positions. Individual scientists and the scientific community at large should confront and counter these attacks on the intellectual integrity that is at the heart of the scientific enterprise.
Keywords: creationism; ideology; intellectual dishonesty; misinformation; opioids; scientific illiteracy; tobacco.
©2020 The Authors. FASEB BioAdvances published by The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
Similar articles
-
Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):384-405. doi: 10.1177/0146167217741314. Epub 2017 Dec 1. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018. PMID: 29191107 Free PMC article.
-
Flood Realities, Perceptions and the Depth of Divisions on Climate.Sociology. 2016 Oct;50(5):913-933. doi: 10.1177/0038038516648547. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Sociology. 2016. PMID: 27818533 Free PMC article.
-
New England Faculty and College Students Differ in Their Views About Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Religiosity.Evolution (N Y). 2011 Jun;4(2):323-342. doi: 10.1007/s12052-010-0298-x. Epub 2010 Dec 18. Evolution (N Y). 2011. PMID: 26962385 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking ideology.Int J Health Serv. 1983;13(2):203-19. doi: 10.2190/0FBG-N8DG-T8N5-Q44P. Int J Health Serv. 1983. PMID: 6343264 Review.
-
Why be against Darwin? Creationism, racism, and the roots of anthropology.Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;149 Suppl 55:95-104. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22163. Epub 2012 Nov 2. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012. PMID: 23124443 Review.
Cited by
-
Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry.BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e057027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057027. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35649587 Free PMC article.
-
The political economy of digital profiteering: communication resource mobilization by anti-vaccination actors.J Commun. 2022 Dec 24;73(2):126-137. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqac043. eCollection 2023 Apr. J Commun. 2022. PMID: 37016634 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Finazzo S, Melton B, Cowles E, et al. NABT: Teaching Biology in the Age of “Alternatives Facts”. Am Biol Teach. 2017;79(6):433.
-
- Rogers K, Hauser C, Yuhas A, Haberman M. Trump’s suggestion that disinfectants could be used to treat coronavirus prompts aggressive pushback. New York Times, 2020, April 24, page 1A.
-
- Roberts P, Brunner J, Malone P. “Hundreds of millions of dollars” lost in Washington to unemployment fraud amid coronavirus joblessness surge. Seattle Times, 2020, May 21.
-
- Miller JD. Public understanding of and attitudes toward scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Underst Sci. 2004;13(3):273‐294.
-
- Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton‐Smith I. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta‐analysis. Public Underst Sci. 2008;17(1):35‐54.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources