Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;62(5):741-752.
doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.5.741. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Quality characteristics and protein digestibility of Protaetia brevitarsis larvae

Affiliations

Quality characteristics and protein digestibility of Protaetia brevitarsis larvae

Seonmin Lee et al. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Herein, the in vitro protein digestibility of lyophilized Protaetia brevitarsis larvae flour with and without defatting using 70% ethanol was compared with beef loin. Proximate analysis showed that the defatted larvae contained the highest protein content (p < 0.05). The viable counts of total aerobic bacteria, Escherichia coli, and coliform bacteria decreased significantly after defatting the larval samples with 70% ethanol (p < 0.05). Measurement of α-amino group content and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) revealed higher amounts of low molecular weight proteins in the larvae compared to beef loin (p < 0.05). After in vitro digestion, the degree of protein hydrolysis of the digesta was higher for both larvae samples compared to beef loin (p < 0.05). No change was observed in the in vitro larval protein digestibility after defatting. These results highlight the excellent protein digestibility of P. brevitarsis larvae with high protein content. Defatting insect flour with 70% ethanol could enhance microbial safety while maintaining excellent protein digestibility.

Keywords: Beef loin; Edible insect; Protaetia brevitarsis; Protein digestibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoretogram of the samples.
IE, insect flour defatted with 70% ethanol; IF, insect flour; BF, beef flour.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoretogram of the in vitro gastrointestinal digesta.
IE, insect flour defatted with 70% ethanol; IF, insect flour; BF, beef flour.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verhoeckx KCM, van Broekhoven S, den Hartog-Jager CF, Gaspari M, de Jong GAH, Wichers HJ, et al. House dust mite (Der p 10) and crustacean allergic patients may react to food containing Yellow mealworm proteins. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;65:364–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.12.049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park ES, Choi MK. Recognition, purchase, and consumption of edible insects in Korean adults. J Nutr Health. 2020;53:190–202. doi: 10.4163/jnh.2020.53.2.190. - DOI
    1. Kim TK, Yong HI, Kim YB, Kim HW, Choi YS. Edible insects as a protein source: a review of public perception, processing technology, and research trends. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:521–40. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e53. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch G, Zhang S, Oonincx DG, Hendriks WH. Protein quality of insects as potential ingredients for dog and cat foods. J Nutr Sci. 2014;3:e29. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch G, Vervoort JJM, Hendriks WH. In vitro digestibility and fermentability of selected insects for dog foods. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016;221:174–84. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.018. - DOI