Interventional Radiology Outpatient Clinics (IROC): Clinical Impact and Patient Satisfaction
- PMID: 33089359
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02677-1
Interventional Radiology Outpatient Clinics (IROC): Clinical Impact and Patient Satisfaction
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively analyze our interventional radiology outpatient clinics (IROC) for referral patterns, impact on interventional practice, and patient satisfaction.
Materials and methods: Consultations performed between 2011 and 2019 were extracted. The two consecutive years with the highest number of consultations (n2018 = 1426; n2019 = 1595) were compared for unattended consultations (i.e., scheduled consultations with patients not showing-up); initial/follow-up consultations; hospital clinician/general practitioner referrals; initial consultations with radiologists not recommending interventions; procedural conversion rate (PCR; i.e., No. initial consultations resulting in interventions over the total number of initial consultations performed for the same clinical indication). A survey was conducted in 159 patients to determine their satisfaction.
Results: Consultations increased from 2011 to 2019 by 130%. In 2018-2019, the number of unattended consultations was stable (7.0% vs 6.6%; P = .68). The referrals were for back pain (42.2%), interventional oncology (40.5%), and arteriovenous malformations (9.0%). For back pain, in 2019, there were fewer consultations with radiologists not recommending interventions and increased PCR compared to 2018 (11.9% vs. 17.7%; 88.1% vs. 82.3%; respectively; P = .01). For interventional oncology, follow-up consultations and general practitioner referrals increased in 2019 compared to 2018 (43.0% vs 35.3%; P = .01; 24.4% vs. 12.7%; P < .01; respectively). No other changes were noted. Cumulative 2018-2019 PCR was ≥ 85.4%. 99.2% responders highly appreciated their IROC experience. Quality of secretarial and medical services were the main aspects evaluated to rate the experience with IROC.
Conclusion: IROC results in high PCR. Recent changes in referral/impact on IR practice were noted with patients referred for back pain and interventional oncology.
Level of evidence iv: Level 4, Case Series.
Keywords: Consultation; Interventional; Outpatients; Radiology; Referral.
References
-
- Dotter CT, Judkins MP, Rösch J. Transluminal angioplasty in arteriosclerotic obstruction of the lower extremities. Med Times. 1969;97(7):95–108. - PubMed
-
- Baum RA, Baum S. Interventional radiology: a half century of innovation. Radiology. 2014;273(2 Suppl):S75-91. - DOI
-
- Baerlocher MO, Owen R, Poole A, et al. Interventional radiology deserves formal recognition as a distinct medical subspecialty: a statement from the Canadian interventional radiology association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(1):9–12. - DOI
-
- Zener R, Demers V, Bilodeau A, et al. Clinical IR in Canada: the evolution of a revolution. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(4):524-530.e2. - DOI
-
- Khan N, Murphy TP, Soares GM, et al. Clinical services provided by interventional radiologists to medicare beneficiaries in the United States, 2000–2003. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(12):1753–7. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials