Evaluating a novel MR-compatible foot pedal device for unipedal and bipedal motion: Test-retest reliability of evoked brain activity
- PMID: 33089953
- PMCID: PMC7721228
- DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25209
Evaluating a novel MR-compatible foot pedal device for unipedal and bipedal motion: Test-retest reliability of evoked brain activity
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a new, open-source MR-compatible device capable of assessing unipedal and bipedal lower extremity movement with minimal head motion and high test-retest reliability. To evaluate the prototype, 20 healthy adults participated in two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visits, separated by 2-6 months, in which they performed a visually guided dorsiflexion/plantar flexion task with their left foot, right foot, and alternating feet. Dependent measures included: evoked blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in the motor network, head movement associated with dorsiflexion/plantar flexion, the test-retest reliability of these measurements. Left and right unipedal movement led to a significant increase in BOLD signal compared to rest in the medial portion of the right and left primary motor cortex (respectively), and the ipsilateral cerebellum (FWE corrected, p < .001). Average head motion was 0.10 ± 0.02 mm. The test-retest reliability was high for the functional MRI data (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]: >0.75) and the angular displacement of the ankle joint (ICC: 0.842). This bipedal device can robustly isolate activity in the motor network during alternating plantarflexion and dorsiflexion with minimal head movement, while providing high test-retest reliability. Ultimately, these data and open-source building instructions will provide a new, economical tool for investigators interested in evaluating brain function resulting from lower extremity movement.
Keywords: MR-compatible device; bipedal movement; brain activity; fMRI; lower extremity; motor impairment; rehabilitation.
© 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Figures




References
-
- Belforte, G. , & Eula, G. (2012). Design of an active–passive device for human ankle movement during functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 226(1), 21–32. 10.1177/0954411911426946 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ciccarelli, O. , Toosy, A. T. , Marsden, J. F. , Wheeler‐Kingshott, C. M. , Sahyoun, C. , Matthews, P. M. , … Thompson, A. J. (2005). Identifying brain regions for integrative sensorimotor processing with ankle movements. Experimental Brain Research, 166(1), 31–42. 10.1007/s00221-005-2335-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources