Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;10(2):79-87.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis

Lauren A Maggio  1 , Joseph A Costello  2 , Candace Norton  2 , Erik W Driessen  3 , Anthony R Artino Jr  4
Affiliations
Review

Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis

Lauren A Maggio et al. Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: This bibliometric analysis maps the landscape of knowledge syntheses in medical education. It provides scholars with a roadmap for understanding where the field has been and where it might go in the future, thereby informing research and educational practice. In particular, this analysis details the venues in which knowledge syntheses are published, the types of syntheses conducted, citation rates they produce, and altmetric attention they garner.

Method: In 2020, the authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of knowledge syntheses published in 14 core medical education journals from 1999 to 2019. To characterize the studies, metadata were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Altmetrics Explorer, and Unpaywall.

Results: The authors analyzed 963 knowledge syntheses representing 3.1% of the total articles published (n = 30,597). On average, 45.9 knowledge syntheses were published annually (SD = 35.85, median = 33), and there was an overall 2620% increase in the number of knowledge syntheses published from 1999 to 2019. The journals each published, on average, a total of 68.8 knowledge syntheses (SD = 67.2, median = 41) with Medical Education publishing the most (n = 189; 19%). Twenty-one types of knowledge synthesis were identified, the most prevalent being systematic reviews (n = 341; 35.4%) and scoping reviews (n = 88; 9.1%). Knowledge syntheses were cited an average of 53.80 times (SD = 107.12, median = 19) and received a mean Altmetric Attention Score of 14.12 (SD = 37.59, median = 6).

Conclusions: There has been considerable growth in knowledge syntheses in medical education over the past 20 years, contributing to medical education's evidence base. Beyond this increase in volume, researchers have introduced methodological diversity in these publications, and the community has taken to social media to share knowledge syntheses. Implications for the field, including the impact of synthesis types and their relationship to knowledge translation, are discussed.

Keywords: Knowledge synthesis; Publishing; Review; Scholarly communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Knowledge synthesis identification
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The number of knowledge syntheses published in 14 core medical education journals between 1999 and 2019
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. Best evidence medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000;5:71–90. - PubMed
    1. Gordon M. Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review. Med Teach. 2016;38:746–750. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation. 2016. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2020.
    1. Thistlethwaite J, Hammick M. The best evidence medical education (BEME) collaboration: into the next decade. Med Teach. 2010;32:880–882. - PubMed
    1. Choi AR, Cheng DL, Greenberg PB. Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review. Med Teach. 2019;41:471–475. - PubMed

MeSH terms