Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses
- PMID: 33093040
- PMCID: PMC8515109
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724
Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses
Abstract
Background: Unprecedented public health actions restricting movement and non-COVID related health services are likely to have affected abortion care during the pandemic in Europe. In the absence of a common approach to ensure access to this essential health service, we sought to describe the variability of abortion policies during the outbreak in Europe in order to identify strategies that improve availability and access to abortion in times of public health crises.
Methods: We collected information from 46 countries/regions: 31 for which country-experts completed a survey and 15 for which we conducted a desk review. We describe abortion regulations and changes to regulations and practice during the pandemic.
Results: During COVID-19, abortions were banned in six countries and suspended in one. Surgical abortion was less available due to COVID-19 in 12 countries/regions and services were not available or delayed for women with COVID-19 symptoms in eleven. No country expanded its gestational limit for abortion. Changes during COVID-19, mostly designed to reduce in-person consultations, occurred in 13 countries/regions. Altogether eight countries/regions provided home medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol beyond 9 weeks (from 9 weeks+6 days to 11 weeks+6 days) and 13 countries/regions up to 9 weeks (in some instances only misoprostol could be taken at home). Only six countries/regions offered abortion by telemedicine.
Conclusions: The lack of a unified policy response to COVID-19 restrictions has widened inequities in abortion access in Europe, but some innovations including telemedicine deployed during the outbreak could serve as a catalyst to ensure continuity and equity of abortion care.
Keywords: abortion; family planning policy; health policy; reproductive health services.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.Fam Pract. 2021 Aug 27;38(Suppl 1):i30-i36. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab083. Fam Pract. 2021. PMID: 34448482 Free PMC article.
-
Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):238-245. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200880. Epub 2021 Jan 11. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33431614 Free PMC article.
-
Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Contraception. 2021. PMID: 33930382 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of COVID-19 on abortion access: Insights from the European Union and the United Kingdom.Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):841-858. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 17. Health Policy. 2021. PMID: 34052058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Innovation in abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, France and Great Britain : Paths to maintaining access and building system resilience].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jan;68(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03995-2. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025. PMID: 39663247 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Cited by
-
The impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on pregnancy and abortion rates in the Republic of Georgia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1435. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10417-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 38110928 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortions and births in Sweden: a mixed-methods study.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 23;12(2):e054076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054076. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35197343 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacological Abortion in a Pandemic: An Italian Medico-Legal Perspective.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212043. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34831795 Free PMC article.
-
Easing of Regulatory Barriers to Telemedicine Abortion in Response to COVID-19.Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Nov 24;2:705611. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.705611. eCollection 2021. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34901929 Free PMC article.
-
Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16813. Epub 2021 Jul 27. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 34138505 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland . Pregnancy terminations in Switzerland in 2018. Available: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etat-sante/repro... [Accessed 18 May 2020].
-
- National Board of Health and Welfare . Swedish Ministry of Health. Statistics on abortion in 2018. Available: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelk... [Accessed 18 May 2020].
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical