Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;47(4):e14.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses

Affiliations

Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses

Caroline Moreau et al. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Unprecedented public health actions restricting movement and non-COVID related health services are likely to have affected abortion care during the pandemic in Europe. In the absence of a common approach to ensure access to this essential health service, we sought to describe the variability of abortion policies during the outbreak in Europe in order to identify strategies that improve availability and access to abortion in times of public health crises.

Methods: We collected information from 46 countries/regions: 31 for which country-experts completed a survey and 15 for which we conducted a desk review. We describe abortion regulations and changes to regulations and practice during the pandemic.

Results: During COVID-19, abortions were banned in six countries and suspended in one. Surgical abortion was less available due to COVID-19 in 12 countries/regions and services were not available or delayed for women with COVID-19 symptoms in eleven. No country expanded its gestational limit for abortion. Changes during COVID-19, mostly designed to reduce in-person consultations, occurred in 13 countries/regions. Altogether eight countries/regions provided home medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol beyond 9 weeks (from 9 weeks+6 days to 11 weeks+6 days) and 13 countries/regions up to 9 weeks (in some instances only misoprostol could be taken at home). Only six countries/regions offered abortion by telemedicine.

Conclusions: The lack of a unified policy response to COVID-19 restrictions has widened inequities in abortion access in Europe, but some innovations including telemedicine deployed during the outbreak could serve as a catalyst to ensure continuity and equity of abortion care.

Keywords: abortion; family planning policy; health policy; reproductive health services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group . Induced abortion. Hum Reprod 2017;32:1160–9. 10.1093/humrep/dex071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. . Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e323–33. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG 2016;123:1489–98. 10.1111/1471-0528.13552 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland . Pregnancy terminations in Switzerland in 2018. Available: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etat-sante/repro... [Accessed 18 May 2020].
    1. National Board of Health and Welfare . Swedish Ministry of Health. Statistics on abortion in 2018. Available: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelk... [Accessed 18 May 2020].