Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 17;12(9):e10519.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.10519.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Unstable Complex Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Management Using the Ligamentotaxor® Device: A Case Series of 33 Cases

Affiliations

Mid-Term Outcomes of Unstable Complex Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Management Using the Ligamentotaxor® Device: A Case Series of 33 Cases

Amr Abouelela et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) of the hand have always been difficult to treat, often leading to less than satisfactory outcomes. The use of dynamic external fixator devices to treat these fractures is well established and it is based on the philosophy of minimal soft tissue injury and early joint mobilization. There has been a wide variety in their designs, surgical technique, and reported outcomes. This study aimed to report the long-term outcome following the use of the Ligamentotaxor® device (Ligamentotaxor1, ArexTM, Palaiseau, France) in treating fractures of the PIPJ of the hand. Methods Between 2009 and 2018, 33 patients treated in our institution with Ligamentotaxor® for fractures of the PIPJ were followed up for a minimum period of 12 months. Radiographs and clinical records were reviewed for clinical and functional outcomes including finger range of motion (ROM), union, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and any complications. Results A total of 33 patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean: 27.5 months). All fractures showed radiological union at a mean of 33 days. Surgery was performed within a mean of 8.9 days and surgical operating time averaged 23.7 minutes. Devices were removed at a mean of 33 days. At the end of the follow-up, the mean range of flexion was 66 degrees and the mean extension lag was six degrees. The mean QuickDASH score was 8.72. Of note, 85% of the patients experienced no limitations in their daily activities, while 35% reported pain on exertion. One patient had a pin tract infection. Four patients had cold intolerance and persistent swelling. Conclusion The results of the use of Ligamentotaxor® in this series are comparable to those of other dynamic external fixator devices reported in the literature. Thanks to its quick and easy surgical technique, the device provides an appealing option for the management of PIPJ fractures.

Keywords: dynamic; fixator; fracture; ligamentotaxis; proximal interphalangeal joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of different types of proximal interphalangeal joint fractures as per Pélissier’s classification
A: extra-articular fractures. B: simple articular fractures. C: pilon fractures. D: fracture involving both ends of the joint. E: palmar lip fractures. F: dorsal lip fractures The fractures are further graded from 1 (one fragment) to 3 (comminuted)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging demonstrating Ligamentotaxor® device installment and fracture reduction
Figure 3
Figure 3. Clinical photographs demonstrating an active range of motion with the device installed during the follow-up visits
Figure 4
Figure 4. Radiographic images at various stages
A: preoperative radiograph demonstrating E2 type fracture of the base of the middle phalanx left ring finger. B: two-week postoperative radiograph demonstrating fracture reduction using the Ligamentotaxor® device. C: six-month postoperative radiograph demonstrating fracture healing and restoration of joint congruency

References

    1. Fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Blazar PE, Steinberg DR. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:383–390. - PubMed
    1. Management of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. Freiberg A, Pollard BA, Macdonald MR, Duncan MJ. Hand Clin. 2006;22:235–242. - PubMed
    1. Dynamic traction and early passive movement for fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Schenck RR. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:850–858. - PubMed
    1. Distraction ligamentotaxis for complex proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations: a clinical study and the modified pins rubber band traction system revisited. Lo CH, Nothdurft SH, Park HS, Paul E, Leong J. Burns Trauma. 2018;6:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treatment of fracture subluxations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a ligamentotaxis device: a multidisciplinary approach. MacFarlane RJ, Gillespie S, Cashin F, Mahmood A, Cheung G, Brown DJ. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;40:825–831. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources