Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 5;3(1):004.
doi: 10.18063/IJB.2017.01.004. eCollection 2017.

Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering

Affiliations
Review

Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering

Hyeong-Jin Lee et al. Int J Bioprint. .

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing in tissue engineering has been studied for the bio mimicry of the structures of human tissues and organs. Now, it is being applied to 3D cell printing, which can position cells and biomaterials, such as growth factors, at desired positions in the 3D space. However, there are some challenges of 3D cell printing, such as cell damage during the printing process and the inability to produce a porous 3D shape owing to the embedding of cells in the hydrogel-based printing ink, which should be biocompatible, biodegradable, and non-toxic, etc. Therefore, researchers have been studying ways to balance or enhance the post-print cell viability and the print-ability of 3D cell printing technologies by accommodating several mechanical, electrical, and chemical based systems. In this mini-review, several common 3D cell printing methods and their modified applications are introduced for overcoming deficiencies of the cell printing process.

Keywords: bioink; cell-printing; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest. This study was partially supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) (Grant no. NRF- 2015R1A2A1A15055305) and also a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (Grant no. HI15C3000).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basic techniques of 3D cell printing, (a) laser-assisted 3D cell printing techniques with and without an absorbing layer,[17,22] (b) thermal, piezoelectric, and acoustic inkjet 3D cell printing systems,[22,28] and (c) microextrusion 3D cell printing systems and products[14,35].
Figure 2
Figure 2
3D cell printing with modified crosslinking processes, (a) aerosol crosslinking process with calcium chloride using an alginate-based bioink[36-38] (b) drop-on-demand (submerged) crosslinking with a laser-assisted printing process[41], (c) submerged printing with a core (MSC-laden collagen) /shell (2-5 wt% alginate) nozzle[44], and (d) cell printing process with a crosslinked solution and absorbing stage using a core (3 wt% alginate-based cell-laden bioink)/shell (1.2 wt% CaCl2)[46].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temperature-controlled 3D cell printing process, (a) increasing temperature-controlled (from 4 to 37°C) printing using ECM-based bioinks [48, 49] and (b) low-temperature (-10°C) cell printing process [50].
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Electrically operated cell printing modification supplemented with the aerosol crosslinking process[51] and (b) extrusion-based cell printing with an electric field (1 to 3 kV in 0.33 to 0.99 mm)[52].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hybrid modifications of the 3D cell printing process with (a, b) a multi-nozzle system using natural and synthetic polymers ((a) Shim et al.[53], (b) Lee et al.[54]) and (c) an additional electrospinning process for surface alignment (Yeo et al.[56]).

References

    1. Whitaker M. The history of 3D printing in healthcare. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England Bulletin. 2014;96:228–229. https://doi.org/10.1308/147363514X13990346756481.
    1. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering - Current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002;295(5557):1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1069210. - PubMed
    1. Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials. 2005;4(7):518–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1421. - PubMed
    1. Whitford WG. Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A development parameters review. Immunome Research. 2016;12(S2):24. https://doi.org/10.4172/1745-7580.c1.004.
    1. Loo Y, Lakshmanan A, Ni M, et al. Peptide bioink:self-assembling nano fibrous scaffolds for three-dimensional organotypic cultures. Nano Letters. 2015;15(10):6919–6925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02859. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources