Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 30;4(3):txaa145.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa145. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Evaluation of warm season annual forages for forage yield and quality in the north-central United States

Affiliations

Evaluation of warm season annual forages for forage yield and quality in the north-central United States

Jonathan S Bleier et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Grazing-based dairy operations require productive, high-quality forages capable of supporting the nutritional needs of mid-lactation dairy cows. Our objectives were to evaluate primary and regrowth harvests of two cultivars of sudangrass (SU), sorghum-sudangrass (S×SU), and pearl millet (PM) forages for growth and nutritive characteristics within the specific context of suitability for grazing by dairy cows. Three harvest cycles, including primary and regrowth cycles in 2016, and a single harvest cycle of primary growth in 2017, were evaluated at two locations (Prairie du Sac and Marshfield, WI). Within each cycle, sampling was initiated when canopy height was about 41 cm and continued thereafter on weekly intervals for 5 weeks, resulting in six equally spaced sampling dates per harvest cycle. Data were analyzed as a split-plot design with cultivars (6) as whole-plots arranged in randomized complete blocks and weekly harvest dates (6) as subplots. Yields of dry matter (DM) were less consistent at the more northern location (Marshfield), which is known for its heavier, poorly drained soils. Despite locational differences, the taller-growing cultivar within each forage type frequently exhibited yield advantages over dwarf or shorter-growing cultivars; this occurred for 7 of 9 intra-forage-type comparisons (P ≤ 0.021) across three harvest cycles at Prairie du Sac, and for 6 of 9 similar comparisons (P ≤ 0.032) at Marshfield. In 2016, shorter-growing cultivars had greater percentages of leaf in 4 of 6 intra-forage-type comparisons at both locations (P ≤ 0.004), which is especially relevant for grazing. Similarly, PM cultivars exhibited shorter canopy heights (P ≤ 0.002), but greater percentages of leaf (P < 0.001), than all other cultivars during all harvest cycles at both locations. However, the greater leaf percentages exhibited by PM cultivars did not translate into reduced percentages of structural plant fiber (asNDFom) on a whole-plant basis during any harvest cycle at either location; furthermore, asNDFom concentrations for PM cultivars were greater (P ≤ 0.047) than observed for other cultivars within 3 of 6 harvest cycles across both locations. Ruminal in-situ degradation of asNDFom for whole-plant forages based on a 48-h incubation was significantly greater (P ≤ 0.006) for PM compared with other cultivars in 4 of 6 harvest cycles. Pearl millet cultivars generally exhibited more suitable characteristics for grazing livestock than SU or S×SU cultivars.

Keywords: DM yield; brown midrib (bmr); fiber digestibility; pearl millet; sorghum-sudangrass; sudangrass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean monthly temperature (top) and precipitation (bottom) at Prairie du Sac (WI) from May through October of 2016 and 2017.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean monthly temperature (top) and precipitation (bottom) at Marshfield (WI) from May through October of 2016 and 2017.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Rumen degradable (48 h) asNDFom, expressed as a percentage of total forage DM, for a pearl millet cultivar 4611 (left) and sudangrass cultivar AS9301 (right) as a function of harvest date, where the gray portion under the curve represents the proportion contributed by leaf tissue. Data labels represent the percentage of rumen degradable asNDFom obtained from leaf tissue. Top and bottom graphs represent Harvests 1 and 2 obtained during 2016 from Prairie du Sac, WI.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Rumen degradable (48 h) asNDFom, expressed as a percentage of total forage DM, for a pearl millet cultivar 4611 (left) and sudangrass cultivar AS9301 (right) as a function of harvest date, where the gray portion under the curve represents the proportion contributed by leaf tissue. Data labels represent the percentage of rumen degradable asNDFom obtained from leaf tissue. Top and bottom graphs represent Harvests I and 2 obtained during 2016 from Marshfield, WI.

References

    1. Alothman M, Hogan S A, Hennessy D, Dillon P, Kilcawley K N, O’Donovan M, Tobin J, Fenelon M A, and O’Callaghan T F. . 2019. The “grass-fed” milk story: understanding the impact of pasture feeding on the composition and quality of bovine milk. Foods. 8:350. doi:10.3390/foods8080350. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson B E, and Volesky J D. . 2013. Summer annual forage grasses. NebGuide #G2183. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska.
    1. AOAC 1998. Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC Official Method #990.03. 16th ed., 4th rev. Gaithersburg (MD): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
    1. Astigarraga L, Bianco A, Mello R, and Montedónico D. . 2014. Comparison of brown midrib sorghum with conventional sorghum forage for grazing dairy cows. Am. J. Plant Sci. 5:955–962. doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.57108. - DOI
    1. Ball D M, Hoveland C S, and Lacefield G D. . 2015. Southern Forages: Modern Concepts for Forage Crop Management. 5th ed. Peachtree Corners (GA): International Plant Nutrition Institute.

LinkOut - more resources