Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?
- PMID: 33095393
- DOI: 10.1007/s10484-020-09492-x
Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?
Abstract
The effects of different feedback conditions on the elbow flexors maximal voluntary isometric (MVIC) force were examined. In a single visit, twenty participants (10 males) were exposed to four conditions including, Visual only; (i.e., knowledge of results [VI]); Verbal encouragement (i.e., verbally stating pull, pull [VE]); VI and VE (VIVE); and no VI or VE (NOVIVE). Three, 5-s MVIC trials were completed for each condition. Separate 2 × 4 (sex × condition) repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine MVIC force, rate of force development (RFD200), and rate of electromyography (EMG) rise (RER200) for the 0-200-ms window. There was a significant main condition effect for MVIC force (p < 0.001). Significantly greater MVIC force was shown for VIVE compared to VE (p < 0.001) and NOVIVE (p = 0.002) conditions, and VI compared to VE (p = 0.011) and NOVIVE (p = 0.009) conditions. A significant sex × condition interaction (p = 0.036) was observed for RFD200, with significantly (p = 0.003) greater RFD200 in males compared to females, in the VI condition only. There were no significant differences in RFD200 among condition for males (p = 0.033) or females (p = 0.194). There was a significant main effect for sex (p = 0.006) for RER200, with significantly greater (p = 0.003) RER200 (conditions merged) in males (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 422.99 ± 124.67%), compared to females (220.68 ± 134.01%). Here we suggest the importance of providing VI feedback alone, or in conjunction with VE, for the measurement of elbow flexion MVIC. Additionally, these results provide a foundational framework for future studies aiming to improve feedback modalities during training or rehabilitation.
Keywords: Maximal voluntary isometric muscle action; Upper extremity; Verbal encouragement; Visual feedback.
References
-
- Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 93(4), 1318–1326. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amagliani, R. M., Peterella, J. K., & Jung, A. P. (2010). Original research. International Journal of Exercise Science, 3(4), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.numa.0000435373.80608.40 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Andersen, L. L., & Aagaard, P. (2006). Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 96(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-0070-z . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arps, G. F. (1917). A preliminary report on “work with knowledge versus work without knowledge of results. Psychological Review, 24(6), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071018 . - DOI
-
- Basmajian, J. V. (1979). Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Williams & Wilkins.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
