A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract's conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect
- PMID: 33096222
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.014
A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract's conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the effect of an intervention compared to the usual peer-review process on reducing spin in the abstract's conclusion of biomedical study reports.
Study design and setting: We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group RCT in a sample of primary research manuscripts submitted to BMJ Open. The authors received short instructions alongside the peer reviewers' comments in the intervention group. We assessed the presence of spin (primary outcome), types of spin, and wording change in the revised abstract's conclusion. Outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention assignment.
Results: Of the 184 manuscripts randomized, 108 (54 intervention, 54 control) were selected for revision and could be evaluated for the presence of spin. The proportion of manuscripts with spin was 6% lower (95% CI: 24% lower to 13% higher) in the intervention group (57%, 31/54) than in the control group (63%, 34/54). The wording of the revised abstract's conclusion was changed in 34/54 (63%) manuscripts in the intervention group and 26/54 (48%) in the control group. The four prespecified types of spin involved (i) selective reporting (12 in the intervention group vs. 8 in the control group), (ii) including information not supported by evidence (9 vs. 9), and (iii) interpretation not consistent with the study results (14 vs. 18), and (iv) unjustified recommendations for practice (5 vs. 11).
Conclusion: These short instructions to authors did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing spin in revised abstract conclusions, and based on the confidence interval, the existence of a large effect can be excluded. Other interventions to reduce spin in reports of original research should be evaluated.
Study registration: osf.io/xnuyt.
Keywords: Editors; Inappropriate extrapolation of results; Meta-research; Misrepresentation; Overinterpretation; Peer review; Publication; RCT; Spin.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005260. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 31030545 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2020 May 18;10(5):e036799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036799. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32430454 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;77:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 May 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27164274
-
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement.Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Jun;83(3):184-95. doi: 10.1177/0008417416648124. Can J Occup Ther. 2016. PMID: 27231387
-
What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.Nurs Ethics. 1998 Sep;5(5):451-8. doi: 10.1177/096973309800500508. Nurs Ethics. 1998. PMID: 9782929 Review.
Cited by
-
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38014743 Free PMC article.
-
Abstracts of randomized controlled trials in pediatric dentistry: reporting quality and spin.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02085-2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023. PMID: 37950213 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36006644 Free PMC article.
-
Misleading Reporting (Spin) in Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology With Statistically Not Significant Results: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2135765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35765. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34874407 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources