Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 23;16(1):104.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00617-9.

Infertility policy analysis: a comparative study of selected lower middle- middle- and high-income countries

Bahar Morshed-Behbahani  1   2 , Minoor Lamyian  3 , Hassan Joulaei  4 , Batool Hossein Rashidi  5 , Ali Montazeri  6   7
Affiliations

Infertility policy analysis: a comparative study of selected lower middle- middle- and high-income countries

Bahar Morshed-Behbahani et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: Infertility has recently become a salient but neglected global issue. Policies to address the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are vital, especially in lower middle and middle-income countries (LMICs). Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the national infertility policies in the selected countries (LMICs comparing with high-income) to determine gaps or to confirm desirable policies in the given health systems.

Methods: This study has executed a comparative policy analysis of infertility services using the universal health coverage framework (financial protection, population coverage, and service features) in three scopes (prevention, treatment, and supportive care). Seven countries that had infertility programs in their health sectors were selected.

Results: The results showed that financial protection was good in high and middle-income countries, but in a lower middle income, and in one high-income country was poor. The findings also showed that health systems in the same countries had no infertility services for men. Preventive and supportive care services were neglected in LMICs by governments.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that income is not the only factor that fulfills universal health coverage for infertility care services. Perhaps to achieve equity in infertility care services, it should be seen as a universal human right to accomplish the right to have a child and to have a life with physical and mental health for all men and women.

Keywords: Infertility care; Policy analysis; Universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flowchart of the selection of the countries
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The study flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411–426. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(5):1104–10. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1139. - PubMed
    1. Morshed-Behbahani B, Mossalanejad L, Shahsavari S, Dastpak M. The experiences of infertile women on assistant reproductive treatments: a phenomenological study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012;14(6):382–383. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organization WH . Sexual and reproductive health: infertility terminology and definitions. 2015.