Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 23;11(1):5375.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19252-4.

General destabilizing effects of eutrophication on grassland productivity at multiple spatial scales

Affiliations

General destabilizing effects of eutrophication on grassland productivity at multiple spatial scales

Yann Hautier et al. Nat Commun. .

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: General destabilizing effects of eutrophication on grassland productivity at multiple spatial scales.
    Hautier Y, Zhang P, Loreau M, Wilcox KR, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Byrnes JEK, Koerner SE, Komatsu KJ, Lefcheck JS, Hector A, Adler PB, Alberti J, Arnillas CA, Bakker JD, Brudvig LA, Bugalho MN, Cadotte M, Caldeira MC, Carroll O, Crawley M, Collins SL, Daleo P, Dee LE, Eisenhauer N, Eskelinen A, Fay PA, Gilbert B, Hansar A, Isbell F, Knops JMH, MacDougall AS, McCulley RL, Moore JL, Morgan JW, Mori AS, Peri PL, Pos ET, Power SA, Price JN, Reich PB, Risch AC, Roscher C, Sankaran M, Schütz M, Smith M, Stevens C, Tognetti PM, Virtanen R, Wardle GM, Wilfahrt PA, Wang S. Hautier Y, et al. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 21;12(1):630. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20997-9. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 33479239 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Eutrophication is a widespread environmental change that usually reduces the stabilizing effect of plant diversity on productivity in local communities. Whether this effect is scale dependent remains to be elucidated. Here, we determine the relationship between plant diversity and temporal stability of productivity for 243 plant communities from 42 grasslands across the globe and quantify the effect of chronic fertilization on these relationships. Unfertilized local communities with more plant species exhibit greater asynchronous dynamics among species in response to natural environmental fluctuations, resulting in greater local stability (alpha stability). Moreover, neighborhood communities that have greater spatial variation in plant species composition within sites (higher beta diversity) have greater spatial asynchrony of productivity among communities, resulting in greater stability at the larger scale (gamma stability). Importantly, fertilization consistently weakens the contribution of plant diversity to both of these stabilizing mechanisms, thus diminishing the positive effect of biodiversity on stability at differing spatial scales. Our findings suggest that preserving grassland functional stability requires conservation of plant diversity within and among ecological communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Conceptual figure illustrating the nonexclusive processes by which species stability, species asynchrony, and spatial asynchrony may contribute to stabilize functioning (such as productivity) within (alpha stability) and among communities (gamma stability).
a Low stability and asynchrony of species within communities result in low alpha stability that in turn results in low gamma stability under low degree of asynchronous dynamics among communities (spatial asynchrony). Relatively high alpha and gamma stability may result from b high species stability and c high species asynchrony. d Relatively high gamma stability may additionally result from high spatial asynchrony. e Path analysis used to assess the relationship of local and beta diversity with the mechanisms promoting stability at multiple spatial scales under unmanipulated control or fertilized condition. Note that species names belong to a given community, they could or could not be the same species among communities. Adapted from Wilcox et al..
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Impact of fertilization on biodiversity–stability relationships across spatial scales.
Stability was measured as the temporal mean of primary productivity divided by its temporal standard deviation. Relationships were generally consistent among the periods of experimental duration considered (Supplementary Table 1). Species richness was positively associated with a alpha (slope and 95% CIs across time = 0.17 (0.08–0.26)) and b gamma stability (0.27 (0.15–0.39)) in the unmanipulated communities, but unrelated to c alpha (0.01 (−0.07 to 0.10)) and d gamma stability (−0.02 (−0.09 to 0.14)) in the fertilized communities. Beta diversity was positively related to e spatial asynchrony (0.18 (0.06–0.30)) and f gamma stability (0.47 (0.19–0.74)) in the unmanipulated communities, but unrelated to g spatial asynchrony (−0.01 (−0.13 to 0.12)) and h gamma stability (0.21 (−0.07 to 0.50)) in the fertilized communities. Note the scale of y-axis differ across panels and this needs to be considered when visually inspecting slopes. Each dot represents the collective subplots across the three replicated 1-m2 subplots for each site, treatment and duration period (n = 160). Colors represent the periods of experimental duration.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Summary of meta-analysis results.
Direct and indirect pathways through which biodiversity, asynchrony, and stability at multiple spatial scales determines gamma stability under a unmanipulated control or b fertilized condition. Boxes represent measured variables and arrows represent relationships among variables. Numbers next to the arrows are averaged effect sizes as standardized path coefficients. Solid green and purple arrows represent significant (P ≤ 0.05) positive and negative coefficients, respectively, and dashed green and purple arrows represent nonsignificant coefficients. Widths of paths are scaled by standardized path coefficients. Percentages next to endogenous variables indicate the range of variance explained by the model (R2) across period of experimental duration.

References

    1. Erisman, J. W. et al. Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.368, 20130116 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galloway JN. The global nitrogen cycle: past, present and future. Sci. China Ser. C. Life Sci. 2005;48:669–677. - PubMed
    1. Tilman D, et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science. 2001;292:281–284. doi: 10.1126/science.1057544. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hautier Y, et al. Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands. Nature. 2014;508:521–525. doi: 10.1038/nature13014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu ZW, et al. Environmental changes drive the temporal stability of semi-arid natural grasslands through altering species asynchrony. J. Ecol. 2015;103:1308–1316. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12441. - DOI

Publication types