Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;34(12):e14128.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.14128. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Impact of Bridging Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Post-transplant Clinical Outcome

Affiliations

Impact of Bridging Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Post-transplant Clinical Outcome

Nia Adeniji et al. Clin Transplant. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Long waiting times due to ongoing organ shortage have led to increased utilization of locoregional therapies (LRTs) to bridge patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to liver transplantation (LT). We performed this study to evaluate the impact of LRTs on post-LT outcomes. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were transplanted for HCC at Stanford University Hospital between 2008 and 2018 (n = 302). We found that receipt of ≥5 LRTs was an independent and significant predictor of poor overall 5-year survival (58.3% vs. 83.3%; HR 2.26, p = .03), poor recurrence-free 5-year survival (51.9% vs. 80.4%; HR 2.12, p = .03), and was associated with higher rates of recurrence (25.0% vs. 7.4%, p = .001). Moreover, recurrent HCC was more likely to be the cause of death (58.3% vs. 41.7%, p = .04) in patients who received ≥5 LRTs. Also, patients who required ≥5 LRTs showed an overall lower rate of radiological complete response (46.9% vs. 97.8%, p = .001) and were more likely to have more advanced pathological stage tumors in the explant (65.6% vs. 29.6%, p < .001). In conclusion, receipt of ≥5 bridging LRTs prior to LT is associated with worse post-transplant clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver cancer; Locoregional therapy; Transarterial chemoembolization; Transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Higher number of locoregional therapies (LRTs) prior to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) predicts poor post-transplant survival. (A) Distribution of patients receiving 0 through 8 LRTs. Observed counts are: 0 LRT n = 15, 1 LRT n = 100, 2 LRT n = 54, 3 LRT n = 65, 4 LRT n = 36, 5 LRT n = 18, 6 LRT n = 12, 7 LRT n = 1, 8 LRT n = 1. (B) A comparison of the overall survival in patients receiving <5 (n = 270) or ≥5 LRTs (n = 32. (C) A comparison of the recurrence-free survival in patients receiving < 5 (n = 270) or ≥ 5 LRTs (n = 32)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Receiving five or more locoregional therapies (LRTs) has a higher incidence of recurrence. (A) Overall hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence rate stratified by <5 LRT and ≥5 LRTs. (B) A comparison of the sites of recurrence in patients with extrahepatic recurrence, stratified by <5 or ≥5 LRTs. Observed counts for each organ are: lung (n = 8 vs. n = 5), bone (n = 6 vs. n = 4), lymph (n = 5 vs. n = 3), and serosa (n = 2 vs. n = 3) for patient receiving <5 or ≥5 LRTs, respectively. Serosal includes pleura and peritoneum. (C) A comparison of the cause of death in patients receiving <5 or ≥5 LRTs. Includes HCC (n = 11 vs. n = 7), respiratory failure (n = 16 vs n = 6), infection (n = 9 vs. n = 1), other cancer (n = 7 vs. n = 3), and liver failure (n = 8 vs. n = 1), respectively. Death by respiratory failure includes causes attributed to cancer and infection. Other cancers causing death in this study include squamous cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, and prostate cancer. * p < .05, ** p < .01
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Receiving five or more locoregional therapies (LRTs) is associated with worse radiological responses. Comparison of radiologic responses, as determined by mRECIST criteria, after LRT treatments, stratified by <5 or ≥5 LRTs. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Liu Z, Suo C, Mao X, et al. Global incidence trends in primary liver cancer by age at diagnosis, sex, region, and etiology, 1990–2017. Cancer. 2020;126(10):2267–2278. - PubMed
    1. Yang JD, Larson JJ, Watt KD, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common indication for liver transplantation and placement on the waitlist in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(5):767–775.e3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogen R, Lo M, DiNorcia J, et al. More than just wait time? Regional differences in liver transplant outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 2019;103:747–754. - PubMed
    1. Nagai S, Kitajima T, Yeddula S, et al. Effect of mandatory 6-month waiting period on waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2020. 10.1002/hep.31223. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types