Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;29(12):2084-2090.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5582. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Enhancing integrated psychosocial oncology through leveraging the oncology social worker's role in collaborative care

Tiffany Courtnage  1 , Nicole E Bates  1   2 , Anne A Armstrong  1 , M Katherine Seitz  1 , Tammy S Weitzman  1 , Jesse R Fann  1   2
Affiliations

Enhancing integrated psychosocial oncology through leveraging the oncology social worker's role in collaborative care

Tiffany Courtnage et al. Psychooncology. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The collaborative care model is effective in delivering evidence-based psychosocial oncology care. Social workers comprise the largest proportion of psychosocial oncology providers in the United States. This study describes the process and perceptions of clinical oncology social workers at a large comprehensive cancer center who transitioned to practicing as care managers within collaborative care.

Methods: We describe the process of engaging clinical oncology social workers as care managers as part of the implementation of collaborative care at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. We then present survey results from 2017 and 2020 of participating social workers' perceptions of the collaborative care model's advantages and disadvantages.

Results: Since the implementation of collaborative care at our institution, key functions of the social worker as care manager were defined. The majority of social workers surveyed in 2017 and 2020 agreed that collaborative care led to improved clinical outcomes, timely access to care, and greater patient satisfaction. They also reported professional advantages: more interdisciplinary team integration, working at the top of their licensure, and improved job satisfaction. Challenges identified included missing important patient needs and creating extra work burden for social workers.

Conclusions: Oncology social workers can be successfully deployed as care managers within a collaborative care model, thus leveraging existing clinical staff to address unmet psychosocial patient needs. This model is feasible and sustainable in a large academic cancer center, requires minimal additional resources, and is favorably viewed by participating social workers in terms of perceived benefits to patients and their own professional roles.

Keywords: cancer; delivery of health care; implementation science; mental health services; oncology; psychiatry; psycho-oncology; social work.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Turnbull Macdonald GC, Baldassarre F, Brown P, et al. Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice, and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Curr Oncol. 2012;19(4):209-216.
    1. Commission on C. Cancer Program Standards: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2015.
    1. Ehlers SL, Davis K, Bluethmann SM, et al. Screening for psychosocial distress among patients with cancer: implications for clinical practice, healthcare policy, and dissemination to enhance cancer survivorship. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(2):282-291.
    1. Oktay JS, Nedjat-Haiem FR, Davis C, Kern KC. Distress screening: experiences of oncology social workers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(6):652-666.
    1. Li M, Kennedy EB, Byrne N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of collaborative care interventions for depression in patients with cancer. Psychooncology. 2017;26(5):573-587.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources