Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;49(2):295-302.
doi: 10.1002/dc.24645. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy

Affiliations

Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy

Priscilla A van Riet et al. Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally "smears" endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff.

Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training "control" slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions.

Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P = .36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P = .48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P = .10).

Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.

Keywords: EUS-guided tissue sampling; cytopathology; smear; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta‐analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine‐needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339‐349. - PubMed
    1. Li H, Li W, Zhou QY, Fan B. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e0207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh HC, Kang H, Lee JY, Choi GJ, Choi JS. Diagnostic accuracy of 22/25‐gauge core needle in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided sampling: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Korean J Intern Med. 2016;31:1073‐1083. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu MM, Jia HY, Yan LL, Li SS, Zheng Y. Comparison of two different size needles in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a meta‐analysis of prospective controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e5802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Li L, Qu C, Liang S, Zeng B, Luo Z. Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle core biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignant lesions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22978. - PMC - PubMed