A comparison of prolonged nonoperative management strategies in cervical stenosis patients: Successes versus failures
- PMID: 33099369
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.041
A comparison of prolonged nonoperative management strategies in cervical stenosis patients: Successes versus failures
Abstract
A paucity of evidence exists regarding the optimal composition of conservative therapies to best treat patients diagnosed with cervical stenosis prior to consideration of surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the nonoperative therapy utilization strategies in cervical stenosis patients successfully managed with conservative treatments versus those that failed medical management and opted for an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Medical records from adult patients with a diagnosis of cervical stenosis from 2007 to 2017 were collected retrospectively from a large insurance database. Patients were divided into two cohorts: patients treated successfully with nonoperative therapies and patients that failed conservative management and opted for ACDF surgery. Nonoperative therapies utilized by the two cohorts were collected over a 2-year surveillance window. A total of 90,037 adult patients with cervical stenosis comprised the base population. There were 83,384 patients (92.6%) successfully treated with nonoperative therapies alone, while 6,653 patients (7.4%) ultimately failed conservative management and received an ACDF. Failure rates of non-operative therapies were higher in smokers (11.2%), patients receiving cervical epidural steroid injections (11.2%), and male patients (8.1%). A greater percentage of patients who failed conservative management utilized opioid medications (p < 0.001), muscle relaxants (p < 0.001), and CESIs (p < 0.001). The costs of treating patients that failed conservative management was double the amount of the successfully treated group (failed cohort: $1,215.73 per patient; successful cohort: $659.58 per patient). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that male patients, smokers, opioid utilization, and obesity were independent predictors of conservative treatment failure.
Keywords: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; Cervical stenosis; Costs; Degenerative spine; Healthcare utilization; Nonoperative therapy.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of successful versus failed nonoperative treatment approaches in patients with degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr;86:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.033. Epub 2021 Jan 30. J Clin Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33775350
-
Regional differences in prolonged non-operative therapy utilization prior to primary ACDF surgery.J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Oct;80:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 19. J Clin Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33099337
-
Gender differences in use of prolonged non-operative therapies prior to index ACDF surgery.J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Jun 3. J Clin Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32507293
-
An Evidence-Based Stepwise Surgical Approach to Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Narrative Review of the Current Literature.World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.109. Epub 2016 Jul 5. World Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 27389939 Review.
-
A comparison study between hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis.Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):981-996. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1666.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32731832
Cited by
-
When Does Intervention End and Surgery Begin? The Role of Interventional Pain Management in the Treatment of Spine Pathology.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Nov;27(11):707-717. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01165-8. Epub 2023 Sep 15. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023. PMID: 37713091 Review.
-
Clinical Trial Quality Assessment in Adult Spinal Surgery: What Do Publication Status, Funding Source, and Result Reporting Tell Us?Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1904-1911. doi: 10.1177/21925682211073313. Epub 2022 Jan 12. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35021913 Free PMC article.
-
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perception of Health Literacy and Barriers to Care Among Cervical Stenosis Patients.Global Spine J. 2025 Sep;15(7):3073-3082. doi: 10.1177/21925682251318262. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39883593 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical