Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;67(5):653-661.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.008.

The Impact of Physical Distancing Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health and Well-Being Among Australian Adolescents

Affiliations

The Impact of Physical Distancing Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health and Well-Being Among Australian Adolescents

Sithum Munasinghe et al. J Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Physical distancing policies in the state of New South Wales (Australia) were implemented on March 23, 2020, because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigated changes in physical activity, dietary behaviors, and well-being during the early period of this policy.

Methods: A cohort of young people aged 13-19 years from Sydney (N = 582) were prospectively followed for 22 weeks (November 18, 2019, to April 19, 2020). Daily, weekly, and monthly trajectories of diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior, well-being, and psychological distress were collected via smartphone, using a series of ecological momentary assessments and smartphone sensors. Differences in health and well-being outcomes were compared pre- and post-implementation of physical distancing guidelines.

Results: After the implementation of physical distancing measures in NSW, there were significant decreases in physical activity (odds ratio [OR] = .53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .34-.83), increases in social media and Internet use (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.15-3.00), and increased screen time based on participants' smartphone screen state. Physical distancing measures were also associated with being alone in the previous hour (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.33-3.28), decreases in happiness (OR = .38, 95% CI = .18-.82), and fast food consumption (OR = .46, 95% CI = .29-.73).

Conclusions: Physical distancing and social restrictions had a contemporaneous impact on health and well-being outcomes associated with chronic disease among young people. As the pandemic evolves, it will be important to consider how to mitigate against any longer term health impacts of physical distancing restrictions.

Keywords: Adolescents; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Diet; Mental health; Physical activity; Social isolation; Well-being; Young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in weekly ecological momentary assessments for (A) diet, (B) physical activity and sedentary behavior, and (C) psychological distress and happiness∗ among aged 13–19 years (n = 582) in Sydney, November 18, 2019, to April, 8, 2020. ∗Psychological distress based on K6 score ≥19 indicating “probable mental disorder”; Happiness based the question “At the moment how happy are you?” with percentage of participants responding “very much” or “quite a lot” presented. Sleep represents the percentage of participants referring less than 8 hours of sleep during the previous night.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Declines in physical activity and increases in smartphone use in March and April 2020 among adolescents aged 13–19 years (n = 515) in Sydney, as measured by smartphone sensors.∗ Step counts (n = 429), screen time (n = 473), and sensor-based activity time (n = 490).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australian Government Department of Health Coronavirus (COVID-19) current situation and case numbers 2020. https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov... Available at: Accessed September 22, 2020.
    1. Hawton K., Arensman E., Gunnell D. Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:468–471. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leigh-Hunt N., Bagguley D., Bash K. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health. 2017;152:157–171. - PubMed
    1. Lobstein T., Jackson-Leach R., Moodie M.L. Child and adolescent obesity: Part of a bigger picture. Lancet. 2015;385:2510–2520. - PMC - PubMed