Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;47(11):9123-9133.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05919-0. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

Marker-assisted selection vis-à-vis bull fertility: coming full circle-a review

Affiliations
Review

Marker-assisted selection vis-à-vis bull fertility: coming full circle-a review

Varinder Singh Raina et al. Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Bull fertility is considered an indispensable trait, as far as farm economics is concerned since it is the successful conception in a cow that provides calf crop, along with the ensuing lactation. This ensures sustainability of a dairy farm. Traditionally, bull fertility did not receive much attention by the farm managers and breeding animals were solely evaluated based on phenotypic predictors, namely, sire conception rate and seminal parameters in bull. With the advent of the molecular era in animal breeding, attempts were made to unravel the genetic complexity of bull fertility by the identification of genetic markers related to the trait. Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) is a methodology that aims at utilizing the genetic information at markers and selecting improved populations for important traits. Traditionally, MAS was pursued using a candidate gene approach for identifying markers related to genes that are already known to have a physiological function related to the trait but this approach had certain shortcomings like stringent criteria for significance testing. Now, with the availability of genome-wide data, the number of markers identified and variance explained in relation to bull fertility has gone up. So, this presents a unique opportunity to revisit MAS by selection based on the information of a large number of genome-wide markers and thus, improving the accuracy of selection.

Keywords: Bull fertility; Genetic markers; Genome-wide data; Marker-assisted selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kappes SM, Keele JM, Stone RT, McGraw RA, Sonstegard TS, Smith TP, Lopez-Corrales NL, Beattie CW (1997) A second-generation linkage map of the bovine genome. Genome Res 7:235–249. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7.3.235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dekkers JCM, VanderWerf JHJ (2007) Strategies, limitations and opportunities for marker-assisted selection in livestock. FAO, 1–64. https://www.fao.org/3/a1120e/a1120e03.pdf .
    1. Sharifzadeh A, Doosti A (2010) Genetic polymorphism at the leptin gene in Iranian holstein cattle by PCR-RFLP. Afr J Microbiol Res 4:1343–1345. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1420.1422 - DOI
    1. Dekkers JCM (2004) Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. J Anim Sci 82:E313-328. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8213_supplE313x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz JJ et al (2000) Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res 10:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.2.220 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources