Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4):e2020.00045.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00045.

Single-Port vs. Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Lymph Node Biopsy

Affiliations

Single-Port vs. Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Lymph Node Biopsy

Marco Casaccia et al. JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The purpose of the investigation was to compare clinical results and diagnostic accuracy for conventional multiport laparoscopic lymph node biopsy (MPLB) and single-port laparoscopic lymph node biopsy (SPLB) operations at a single institution.

Methods: A set of 20 SPLB patients operated on from October 2016 to May 2019 were compared to an historical series of 35 MPLB patients. Primary endpoints were the time of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical conversion, length of stay and morbidity. The secondary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of the technique.

Results: SPLB was completed laparoscopically in all cases. Two MPLB patients (5.7%) experienced a surgical conversion due to intraoperative difficulties. Duration of surgery was similar in SPLB and MPLB groups respectively (84 ± 31.7 min vs. 81.1 ± 22.2; P = .455). A shorter duration of hospital stay was shown for patients operated on by SPLB compared to the MPLB group (1.7 ± 0.9 days vs. 2.1 ± 1.2 days; P = .133). The postoperative course was uneventful in both groups. In 95% of the SPLB and 97.1% of the MPLB cases respectively, LLB achieved the necessary information for the diagnosis.

Conclusion: SPLB has shown good procedural and postoperative outcomes as well as a high diagnostic yield, comparable to traditional MPLB. Therefore, our results show that this approach is safe and effective and can be an equally valid option to MPLB to obtain a diagnosis or to follow the progression of a lymphoproliferative disease. Further studies are necessary to support these results before its widespread adoption.

Keywords: Abdominal biopsy; Laparoscopy; Lymph node; Lymphoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Intra-operative view. Gastric suspension through trans abdominal sutures passed on the greater curvature, according to the “puppeteering technique”.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The four-channel Unimax single-port device positioned at the umbilicus for a laparoscopic procedure in case of submesocolic lymphadenopathy.

References

    1. Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, et al. . Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (dlbcl): esmo clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(suppl 5):v116–25. - PubMed
    1. Gilbert RWD, Bird BH, Murphy MG, O'Boyle CJ. Should laparoscopic lymph node biopsy be the preferred diagnostic modality for isolated abdominal lymphadenopathy?. Curr Oncol. 2019;26(3):e341–e345. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daly SC, Klairmont M, Arslan B, et al. . Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2496–2499. - PubMed
    1. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. Short note: one wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695–697. - PubMed
    1. Ponsky TA, Diluciano J, Chwals W, Parry R, Boulanger S. Early experience with single port laparoscopic surgery in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(4):551–553. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources