Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 15:11:579176.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579176. eCollection 2020.

Implementation of Guidelines on Prevention of Coercion and Violence (PreVCo) in Psychiatry: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Affiliations

Implementation of Guidelines on Prevention of Coercion and Violence (PreVCo) in Psychiatry: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Tilman Steinert et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Coercive measures are among the most controversial interventions in psychiatry. There is a large discrepancy between the sheer number of high-quality guidelines and the small number of scientifically accompanied initiatives to promote and evaluate their implementation into clinical routine. In Germany, an expert group developed guidelines to provide evidence- and consensus-based recommendations on how to deal with violence and coercion in psychiatry.

Methods: The study presented examines whether coercive measures on psychiatric wards can be reduced by means of an operationalized implementation of the guidelines "Prevention of coercion: prevention and therapy of aggressive behavior in adults". Out of a set of 12 interventions offered, wards are free to choose three interventions they want to implement. The primary outcome is the number of coercive measures per bed and month/year. Secondary outcomes are cumulative duration of coercive measures per bed and month/year. The most important control variable is the number of aggressive incidents. We plan to recruit 52 wards in Germany. Wards treating both voluntary and compulsorily admitted patients will be included. A 1:1 stratified randomized controlled trial will be conducted stratified by the amount of coercive measures and implemented aspects of the guidelines. In addition to the control group analysis, a waiting list design allows a pre-post analysis for all participating wards of the waiting list group. A parallel qualitative study will examine factors related to successful implementation and to successful reduction of coercion as well as relevant barriers.

Discussion: We are planning a nationwide study on the implementation of evidence- and consensus-based guidelines in psychiatric hospitals. This study intends to promote the transfer of expert knowledge as well as results from clinical trials into clinical routine with the potential to change supply structures in mental health sector.

Clinical trial registration: www.isrctn.com, identifier ISRCTN71467851.

Keywords: clinical guidelines; coercive measures; evidence based treatment; psychiatry; quality management; restraint; seclusion; violence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SPIRIT flow chart: Timeline and study procedures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. German Federal Constitutional Court Court Ruling of March 23, 2011. Available at: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20110323_2bvr088209.html (Accessed December 16, 2019).
    1. German Federal Constitutional Court Court Ruling of July 24, 2018 . Available at: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/2018/07/... (Accessed December 16, 2019).
    1. German Federal Constitutional Court Court Ruling of July 26, 2016 . Available at: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/2016/07/... (Accessed December 16, 2019).
    1. Flammer E, Steinert T. The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation. Psychiatr Prax (2019) 46:82–9. 10.1055/a-0665-6728 - DOI - PubMed
    1. German Association for Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, DGPPN (Ed.). Respect for self-determination and use of coercion in the treatment of mentally ill persons: an ethical position statement of the DGPPN. Springer; (2014) 85(11):1419–31. 10.1007/s00115-014-4202-8 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources