Analysis of waterpipe aerosol constituents in accordance with the ISO standard 22486
- PMID: 33102137
- PMCID: PMC7569180
- DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.007
Analysis of waterpipe aerosol constituents in accordance with the ISO standard 22486
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Analysis of waterpipe aerosol constituents in accordance with the ISO standard 22486" [Toxicol. Rep. 7 (2020) 1344-1349].Toxicol Rep. 2024 Nov 19;13:101804. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101804. eCollection 2024 Dec. Toxicol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39629242 Free PMC article.
-
Corrigendum regarding missing or incorrect declaration of competing interest statements in previously published articles.Toxicol Rep. 2024 Dec 24;14:101881. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101881. eCollection 2025 Jun. Toxicol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39811820 Free PMC article.
Abstract
This study analyzed commercial waterpipe tobacco products in accordance with the newly developed ISO 22486 as well as with commercial waterpipes and charcoals using the ISO 22486 puffing regime for comparison. The aerosols from these products were analyzed for their nicotine, humectant, tobacco specific nitrosamine, carbonyl, benzo[a]pyrene, and metal yields. Significant differences were observed among the waterpipe tobacco products when analyzed in accordance with the ISO standard 22486 and with different commercial waterpipes and charcoals. The concentrations of CO and benzo[a]pyrene observed in the consumers' configuration using the ISO 22486 puffing regime (with lit charcoal) were higher than those obtained with the ISO standard using electrical heating, with the yields for carbonyl compounds being lower or higher. The use of the recently published ISO standard for generating water pipe tobacco aerosols should be complemented with analysis by using the consumers' configuration. The necessity for this was demonstrated by the differences in CO and benzo[a]pyrene yields in the present work. It appears that the temperature (280°C) selected for electrical heating of waterpipe tobacco products in ISO 22486 is somewhat lower than that obtained with commercial charcoals, resulting in a generally lower yield of nicotine and total collected matter. In addition, there is a need to evaluate the contribution of commercial charcoals to the concentration of constituents in waterpipe aerosols. This is particularly true for compounds resulting from charcoal combustion, such as CO and benzo[a]pyrene.
Keywords: Aldehydes; BaP, benzo[a]pyrene; Charcoals for waterpipe; Formaldehyde; HPHC, harmful and potentially harmful constituents; ISO 22486; NAB, N’-nitrosoanabasine; NAT, N’-nitrosoanatabine; NNK, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-bipyridyl)-1-butanone; NNN, N’-nitrosonornicotine; PAH, polyaromatic hydrocarbons; PG, propyleneglycol; RS, reducing sugars; TA, total alkaloids; TCM, total collected matter; TSNA, tobacco specific nitrosamines; Waterpipe; Waterpipe aerosols.
© 2020 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Jawad M., Cheeseman H., Brose L.S. Waterpipe tobacco smoking prevalence among young people in Great Britain, 2013-2016. Eur. J. Public Health. 2018;28:548–552. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources