Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 30;9(7):3321-3327.
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_57_20. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status

Kumar Guru Mishra  1 , Vikas Bhatia  1 , Ranjeeta Nayak  1
Affiliations

Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status

Kumar Guru Mishra et al. J Family Med Prim Care. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Underweight/ Undernourished is a state when the body mass index (BMI) falls below 18.5 kg/m2 and as per National Family and Health Survey-4, 22.9% of women in the reproductive age group fall into this category. Despite being considered as an important anthropometry marker, it is not measured in most of the healthcare facilities across India due to lack of basic amenities and resources. In such instances, how helpful other indicators like mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be to measure the undernourished status of pregnant needs to be determined.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of undernutrition in pregnant women (PW) based on baseline BMI and MUAC and to determine the association between them.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tangi Block of Odisha among 440 PW (in the first trimester) from July 2018 to November 2018 using a pre-tested, validated questionnaire and anthropometric instruments.

Results: PW having BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were found to be 16.6% and having MUAC <23.5 cm were 19.5%. A significant association was found between BMI and MUAC [aOR 7.91 (4.27-14.65)]. Also, a moderate correlation was established between the indicators (r = 0.57).

Conclusion: MUAC can be used instead of BMI as it is easier to measure, cheaper, does not require any training or calculations, and insensitive to changes during the period of gestation unlike BMI. This can be beneficial to the healthcare workers at primary level who are in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: Anthropometry; body mass index; maternal health; maternal nutrition; mid-upper arm circumference; pregnant women; undernutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph showing correlation between MUAC and BMI. X-axis: Body Mass Index (BMI), Y-axis: Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC); r = 0.57; R2 = 0.334; p < 0.001; [y = 0.413x + 16.92; 0.413 is the slope and 16.92 is the y-intercept (i.e., the value of y when x = 0)]; r = correlation coefficient; R2 – coefficient of determination
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adikari AMNT, Sivakanesan R, Wijesinghe DGNG, Liyanage C. Assessment of nutritional status of PW in a rural area in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res. 2016;27:203–11.
    1. Mridula D, Mishra CP, Chakraverty A. Dietary intake of expectant mother. Indian J Nutr Diet. 2003;40:24–30.
    1. Opara JA, Adebola HE, Oguzor NS, Abere SA. Malnutrition during pregnancy among child bearing mothers in Mbaitolu of South-Eastern Nigeria. Adv Biol Res. 2011;5:111–5.
    1. Sen J, Roy A, Mondal N. Association of maternal nutritional status, body composition and socio-economic variables with low birth weight in India. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56:254–9. - PubMed
    1. WHO Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995a;854:1–452. - PubMed