Oral versus intravenous iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia: An observational study
- PMID: 33102339
- PMCID: PMC7567229
- DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_559_20
Oral versus intravenous iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia: An observational study
Abstract
Background: Intravenous (IV) iron sucrose is claimed to have better safety profile and efficacy in treatment of iron deficiency anemia than conventional oral iron supplements.
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of IV iron therapy with oral iron supplements in iron deficiency anemia.
Methods: An observational study was carried out by allocating 100 patients with baseline hemoglobin between 5 and 10 g/dL into two groups of oral iron and IV iron group. Hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels were measured at admission, on day 14 and on day 28. Adverse effect profile for each group was tabulated. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for each group and compared.
Results: A total of 100 patients participated consisting of 37 males and 63 females. Baseline hemoglobin and serum ferritin for both groups were comparable. After initiation of therapy, hemoglobin in oral iron group raised from 6.45 (0.72) to 8.84 (0.47) on day 14 and to 9.69 (0.47) on day 28. Hemoglobin in IV iron group increased from 6.34 (0.86) to 10.52 (0.61) on day 14 and to 11.66 (0.84) on day 28. Serum ferritin in oral iron group increased from 8.3 (1.9) to 33.8 (1.29) on day 14 and to 43.61 (8.8) on day 28. Serum ferritin in IV iron group raised from 8.23 (4.64) to 148.23 (11.86) on day 14 but decreased to 115.76 (15.3) on day 28. The data were statistically significant for IV iron therapy on day 14 and day 28. Of 100 patients, 18 patients (12 in oral and 6 in IV iron groups) had adverse effects. Among the oral iron group, metallic taste and constipation were major side effects followed by heart burn and nausea. In the IV iron group, arthralgia (4 patients of 6) was the major side effect observed. One patient (of 6) in IV group had hypotension. Anaphylaxis was not observed in any patient in either group.
Conclusion: IV iron therapy is effective and safe for management of iron deficiency anemia.
Keywords: Iron deficiency anemia; intravenous iron sucrose; oral ferrous sulfate.
Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Farkin F, Chesterman C, Penington D, Rush B. De Gruchy's Clinical hematology in Medical Practice. Germany: 2008-Blackwell Science Ltd; Hypochromic anemia: Iron deficiency and Sideroblastic anemia.
-
- Benoist De, Cogswell M, Egli I, McLean E. Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993-2005. WHO Global Database of Anaemia - PubMed
-
- Gulmezoglu AM, Vilar J, Ngoc NT, Piaggio G, Adetoro L, Abdel-Aleem H, et al. WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour. Lancet. 2001;358:689–95. - PubMed
-
- Cooke M, Lamplugh A, Naudeer S, Edey M, Bhandari S. Efficacy and tolerability of accelerated-dose low-molecular-weight iron dextran (cosmofer) in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35:69–74. - PubMed
-
- Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Sharma A, Sharma K, Prasad K, Kalita MC, et al. Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant and lactating women in India. Indian J Med Res. 2006;124:173–84. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources