Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 8:7:562798.
doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.562798. eCollection 2020.

Current Opinion on Molecular Characterization for GBM Classification in Guiding Clinical Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Current Opinion on Molecular Characterization for GBM Classification in Guiding Clinical Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

Pei Zhang et al. Front Mol Biosci. .

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly invasive and the deadliest brain tumor in adults. It is characterized by inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity, short patient survival, and lack of effective treatment. Prognosis and therapy selection is driven by molecular data from gene transcription, genetic alterations and DNA methylation. The four GBM molecular subtypes are proneural, neural, classical, and mesenchymal. More effective personalized therapy heavily depends on higher resolution molecular subtype signatures, combined with gene therapy, immunotherapy and organoid technology. In this review, we summarize the principal GBM molecular classifications that guide diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic recommendations.

Keywords: DNA methylation-based subtype; genetic alteration-based subtype; glioblastoma; molecular heterogeneity; subtype-specific therapy; transcription-based subtype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The process of molecular-based GBM classification: (A) GBM classification timeline and classical subtypes. (B) The relative overlap between subtypes from different classification methods.

References

    1. Abedalthagafi M., Barakeh D., Foshay K. M. (2018). Immunogenetics of glioblastoma: the future of personalized patient management. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2:27. 10.1038/s41698-018-0070-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexandrescu S., Korshunov A., Lai S. H., Dabiri S., Patil S., Li R., et al. (2016). Epithelioid glioblastomas and anaplastic epithelioid pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas-same entity or first cousins? Brain Pathol. 26 215–223. 10.1111/bpa.12295 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso M. M., Gomez-Manzano C., Bekele B. N., Yung W. K. A., Fueyo J. (2007). Adenovirus-based strategies overcome temozolomide resistance by silencing the O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter. Cancer Res. 67 11499–11504. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5312 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baysan M., Bozdag S., Cam M. C., Kotliarova S., Ahn S., Walling J., et al. (2012). G-cimp status prediction of glioblastoma samples using mRNA expression data. PLoS One 7:e47839. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047839 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beiko J., Suki D., Hess K. R., Fox B. D., Cheung V. J., Cabral M., et al. (2014). IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical resection. Neuro Oncol. 16 81–91. 10.1093/neuonc/not159 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources