Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 9;4(5):790-794.
doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12412. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Clinical adoption of robotics in endoscopy: Challenges and solutions

Affiliations
Review

Clinical adoption of robotics in endoscopy: Challenges and solutions

Hung Leng Kaan et al. JGH Open. .

Abstract

The endoscope was traditionally used as a diagnostic instrument. In past decades, it has increasingly been adapted for therapeutic intents. Subsequently, the master-slave robotic concept was introduced into the field of endoscopy to potentially reduce the difficulty and complication rates of endoscopic therapeutic procedures. As interest in robotic endoscopy intensified, progressively more robotic endoscopic platforms were developed, tested, and introduced. Nevertheless, the future of robotic endoscopy hinges on the ability to meet specific clinical needs of procedurists. Three aspects are vital in ensuring continued success and clinical adoption of the robotic endoscope-demonstration of clinical safety and cost-efficacy of the device, widespread availability of directed training opportunities to enhance technical skills and clinical decision-making capabilities of the procedurist, and continued identification of new clinical applications beyond the current uses of the device. This review provides a brief discussion of the historical development of robotic endoscopy, current robotic endoscopic platforms, use of robotic endoscopy in conventional therapeutic endoscopic procedures, and the future of robotic endoscopy.

Keywords: flexible endoscopy; robotics; therapeutic endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Set up of the Endomaster Endoluminal Access Surgical Efficacy System.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klibansky D, Rothstein RI. Robotics in endoscopy. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2012; 28: 477–82. - PubMed
    1. Khan R, Plahouras J, Johnston BC, Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Walsh CM. Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a cochrane review and meta‐analysis. Endoscopy. 2019; 51: 653–64. - PubMed
    1. Bric JD, Lumbard DC, Frelich MJ, Gould JC. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30: 2169–78. - PubMed
    1. Visconti TAC, Otoch JP, Artifon ELA. Robotic endoscopy. A review of the literature. Acta Cir. Bras. 2020; 35: e202000206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane T. A short history of robotic surgery. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2018; 100 (6_sup): 5–7. - PMC - PubMed