Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan-Feb;6(1):100597.
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

The Declining Residency Applicant Pool: A Multi-Institutional Medical Student Survey to Identify Precipitating Factors

Trudy C Wu  1 , Susan A McCloskey  1 , Paul E Wallner  2   3 , Michael L Steinberg  1 , Ann C Raldow  1
Affiliations

The Declining Residency Applicant Pool: A Multi-Institutional Medical Student Survey to Identify Precipitating Factors

Trudy C Wu et al. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to better understand and identify concerns that may be responsible for the declining radiation oncology (RO) residency applicant pool.

Methods and materials: All RO residency programs affiliated with a US medical school were asked to participate in the study survey. An optional and anonymous survey consisting of 12 questions was emailed to all graduating medical students in 2020 at the 12 allopathic medical schools that agreed to survey administration. Survey responses were collected from March to May 2020.

Results: The study consisted of 265 survey responses out of 1766 distributed to eligible medical students, resulting in a response rate of 15.0%. The majority of students reported no exposure to RO (60.8%) and never considered it as a career option (63.8%). Neutral perceptions of the field were more common (54.3%) than positive (39.6%) and negative (6.0%). The top factors attracting medical students to RO were perceptions of high salary, favorable lifestyle and workload, and technological focus. The top negative factors were the field's interplay with physics, competitive United States Medical Licensing Examination board scores for matched applicants, and the focus placed on research during medical school. In the subgroup of students who were interested in RO but ultimately applied to another specialty, the job market was the most salient concern.

Conclusions: Finding a place for RO in medical school curricula remains a challenge, with most surveyed students reporting no exposure during their education. Concern over the job market was the primary deterrent for medical students interested in pursuing RO. For disinterested students who had not considered RO as a career option, the required physics knowledge was the main deterrent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Did you have exposure to radiation oncology in medical school?
Figure 2
Figure 2
What do you consider to be positive aspects of radiation oncology?
Figure 3
Figure 3
What do you consider to be negative aspects of radiation oncology?
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Ahmed A.A., Holliday E.B., Deville C. Attracting future radiation oncologists: An analysis of the national resident matching program data trends from 2004 to 2015. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:965–967. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A., Royce T.J., Goodman C.R. Unfilled positions in the 2019 National Resident Matching Program Radiation Oncology Match and Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9:501–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: 2005-2020 Main Residency Match®. National Resident Matching Program; Washington, DC: 2005-2020.
    1. Bates J.E., Amdur R.J., Lee W.R. Unfilled positions in the 2020 Radiation Oncology Residency Match: No longer an isolated event. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:e307–e308. - PubMed
    1. Bates J.E., Amdur R.J., Lee W.R. The high number of unfilled positions in the 2019 radiation oncology residency match: Temporary variation or indicator of important change? Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9:300–302. - PubMed