Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;99(1):13-23.
doi: 10.1002/jnr.24631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Affiliations
Review

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Bettina J Casad et al. J Neurosci Res. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Recently there is widespread interest in women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); however, progress toward gender equality in these fields is slow. More alarmingly, these gender disparities worsen when examining women's representation within STEM departments in academia. While the number of women receiving postgraduate degrees has increased in recent years, the number of women in STEM faculty positions remains largely unchanged. One explanation for this lack of progress toward gender parity is negative and pervasive gender stereotypes, which may facilitate hiring discrimination and reduce opportunities for women's career advancement. Women in STEM also have lower social capital (e.g., support networks), limiting women's opportunities to earn tenure and learn about grant funding mechanisms. Women faculty in STEM may also perceive their academic climate as unwelcoming and threatening, and report hostility and uncomfortable tensions in their work environments, such as sexual harassment and discrimination. Merely the presence of gender-biased cues in physical spaces targeted toward men (e.g., "geeky" décor) can foster a sense of not belonging in STEM. We describe the following three factors that likely contribute to gender inequalities and women's departure from academic STEM fields: (a) numeric underrepresentation and stereotypes, (b) lack of supportive social networks, and (c) chilly academic climates. We discuss potential solutions for these problems, focusing on National Science Foundation-funded ADVANCE organizational change interventions that target (a) recruiting diverse applicants (e.g., training search committees), (b) mentoring, networking, and professional development (e.g., promoting women faculty networks); and (c) improving academic climate (e.g., educating male faculty on gender bias).

Keywords: STEM; gender inequality; women faculty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002
    1. ADVANCE Program. University of Michigan. (n.d.). ADVANCE Program: About launch. Retrieved from https://advance.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Launchee-Handout.pdf
    1. Austin, A. E., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Strategic intervention brief #3. Mentoring and networking activities. In S. L. Laursen & A. E. Austin (Eds.), StratEGIC Toolkit: Strategies for effecting gender equity and institutional change. Boulder, CO. Retrieved from www.strategictoolkit.org
    1. Bagilhole, B. (2017). Being different is a very difficult row to hoe: Survival strategies of women academics. In J. Quinn, S. Davies, & C. Lubelska (Eds.), Changing the subject: Womenin higher education (pp. 15-28). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
    1. Belle, D., Smith-Doerr, L., & O’Brien, L. M. (2014). Gendered networks: Professional connections of science and engineering faculty. Advances in Gender Research, 19, 153-175.

LinkOut - more resources