Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718.
doi: 10.2196/24718.

Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey

Affiliations

Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey

Mirou Jaana et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: The burden of population aging and chronic conditions has been reported worldwide. Older adults, especially those with high needs, experience social isolation and have high rates of emergency visits and limited satisfaction with the care they receive. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies present opportunities to address these challenges. To date, limited information is available on Canadian older adults' attitudes toward and use of mHealth technologies for self-tracking purposes-an area that is increasingly important and relevant during the COVID-19 era.

Objective: This study presents contributions to an underresearched area on older adults and mHealth technology use. The aim of this study was to compare older adults' use of mHealth technologies to that of the general adult population in Canada and to investigate the factors that affect their use.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey on mHealth and digital self-tracking was conducted. A web-based questionnaire was administered to a national sample of 4109 Canadian residents who spoke either English or French. The survey instrument consisted of 3 sections assessing the following items: (1) demographic characteristics, health status, and comorbidities; (2) familiarity with and use of mHealth technologies (ie, mobile apps, consumer smart devices/wearables such as vital signs monitors, bathroom scales, fitness trackers, intelligent clothing); and (3) factors influencing the continued use of mHealth technologies.

Results: Significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population in the use of smart technologies and internet (P<.001). Approximately 47.4% (323/682) of the older adults in the community reported using smartphones and 49.8% (340/682) indicated using digital tablets. Only 19.6% (91/463) of the older adults using smartphones/digital tablets reported downloading mobile apps, and 12.3% (47/383) of the older adults who heard of smart devices/wearables indicated using them. The majority of the mobile apps downloaded by older adults was health-related; interestingly, their use was sustained over a longer period of time (P=.007) by the older adults compared to that by the general population. Approximately 62.7% (428/682) of the older adults reported tracking their health measures, but the majority did so manually. Older adults with one or more chronic conditions were mostly nontrackers (odds ratio 0.439 and 0.431 for traditional trackers and digital trackers, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population with regard to satisfaction with mHealth technologies and their intention to continue using them.

Conclusions: Leveraging mHealth technologies in partnership with health care providers and sharing of health/well-being data with health care professionals and family members remain very limited. A culture shift in the provision of care to older adults is deemed necessary to keep up with the development of mHealth technologies and the changing demographics and expectations of patients and their caregivers.

Keywords: elderly; mobile apps; mobile health; mobile phone; older adults; self-tracking; seniors; smart devices; survey; wearable technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the partial least squares regression analyses that were performed to test the associations between satisfaction, initial expectations, and intention to continue using smart devices/wearables. * P<.05; **P<.01; ***P<.005; ns: nonsignificant.

References

    1. Bloom DE. 7 billion and counting. Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):562–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1209290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osborn R, Doty MM, Moulds D, Sarnak DO, Shah A. Older Americans Were Sicker And Faced More Financial Barriers To Health Care Than Counterparts In Other Countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017 Dec;36(12):2123–2132. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations. World population ageing 2017. 2017. [2020-10-25]. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/agein... https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/agein....
    1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(17)32154-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Commonwealth Fund 2017 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults in 11 Countries. [2020-10-25]. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/infographic/2017/dec/2017-....