Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;25(6):594-600.
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000820.

Ethical and societal challenges in penis transplantation

André van der Merwe  1 , Mogamat R Moosa  2 , Nicola Barsdorf  3
Affiliations
Review

Ethical and societal challenges in penis transplantation

André van der Merwe et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review the current understanding of the ethical and societal difficulties of penile transplantation.

Recent findings: Penile transplantation, as with other forms of vascularized composite allotransplantation, has increasing acceptance in society but is still not entirely accepted. Guidelines aiming to help guide future penile transplant programs in an ethical and scientific safe manner were created. Controversies regarding the economic impact, patient safety, and the rights of the patients choosing penile transplant remains.

Summary: Penile transplantation has excellent functional and cosmetic results in the short-term and medium-term. The penis, similar to the face in facial transplantation, carries emotional gravity that relates to visible body parts of another that live forth in a tangible manner contributing to psychological and ethical challenges for both the individual and society more broadly, healthcare administrators, and healthcare workers. In the context of these challenges, controversies emerge related to issues of judgment about what society can and wants to afford. Effects of toxic immunosuppression in a nonlife saving life-enhancing procedure, as well as costs, become arguments that have to be considered in the context of ethical and societal challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. FitzGibbon GM. The commandments of Gillies. Br J Plast Surg 1968; 21:226–239.
    1. Cetrulo CL Jr, Li K, Salinas HM, et al. First US experience. Ann Surg 2018; 267:983–988.
    1. MedicalBrief SA. SA surgeons perform another successful penis transplant. https://www.medicalbrief.co.za/archives/sa-surgeons-perform-another-succ.... [Updated 24 May 2017; accessed 16 June 2020]. Online source.
    1. Redett RJ III, Etra JW, Brandacher G, et al. Total penis, scrotum, and lower abdominal wall transplantation. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1876–1878.
    1. van der Merwe A, Graewe F, Zuhlke A, et al. Penile allotransplantation for penis amputation following ritual circumcision: a case report with 24 months of follow-up. Lancet 2017; 390:1038–1047.

LinkOut - more resources