Clinical Performance of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Real-World Obese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 33105504
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715792
Clinical Performance of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Real-World Obese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
The prevalence of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and obesity has steadily increased. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be more effective and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. There are still limited data in the literature regarding performance of NOACs in obese patients with AF in the "real world." The aim of our study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of NOACs versus well-controlled VKA therapy in obese AF patients in a "real-world" setting. Here, we have considered patients with AF and obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2) on NOAC or VKA therapy included in the multicenter Atrial Fibrillation Research Database (NCT03760874). The occurrence of major bleedings (MBs) and thromboembolic events (composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism) was respectively considered primary safety and effectiveness outcomes. We identified 1,047 AF patients with obesity who received NOAC (n = 272) or VKA (n = 775) treatment. After propensity score matching analysis, 248 NOAC and 496 VKA recipients with similar clinical characteristics, including BMI (34.8 ± 3.4 in NOAC vs. 35.1 ± 3.8 in the VKA group; p = 0.50), were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 39 ± 7 months. The incidence rate of thromboembolic events was 1.10 per 100 person-years (0.67 in NOAC vs. 1.28 in the VKA group; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-1.22; p = 0.19). The incidence rate of MB was 1.9 per 100 person-years (1.1 in NOAC vs. 2.28 in the VKA group; HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.88; p = 0.04). The incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 0.4 per 100 person-years (0.27 in NOAC vs. 0.47 in the VKA group; HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.12-2.73; p = 0.48). A positive net clinical benefit (NCB) of NOACs over VKAs was found (+0.91). Presence of anemia (HR: 1.75; p = 0.003) and concomitant use of antiplatelet drugs (HR: 2.41; p = 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of MB; moreover, age (HR: 1.65; p = 0.003) was an independent predictor of thromboembolic events. Our data support the hypothesis of safe and effective use of NOACs in patients with AF and obesity, justified by a statistically significant lower incidence of MB and a favorable NCB over VKAs.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01923-9. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020. PMID: 31385163 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical Outcome of Edoxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Diabetes Mellitus: Results from a Multicenter, Propensity-Matched, Real-World Cohort Study.J Clin Med. 2020 May 27;9(6):1621. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061621. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32471222 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Benefit of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.Clin Ther. 2019 Dec;41(12):2549-2557. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Clin Ther. 2019. PMID: 31735436
-
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and (Morbid) Obesity or Low Body Weight: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Aug;36(4):749-761. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07122-6. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022. PMID: 33428092
-
Real-world use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: A meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):676-683. doi: 10.1002/clc.23408. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32557677 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 28;59(2):254. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020254. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 36837457 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Special Populations: Beyond the Clinical Trials.Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 4;11(1):131. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010131. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 36672639 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence and clinical predictors of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosage in octagenarians with atrial fibrillation.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;78(5):879-886. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03286-2. Epub 2022 Feb 9. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35138442 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in comparison to warfarin in obese patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 21;7(4):e2044. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2044. eCollection 2024 Apr. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38650729 Free PMC article.
-
Non Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Scheduled for Electrical Cardioversion: A Real-Life Propensity Score Matched Study.J Blood Med. 2021 Jun 4;12:413-420. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S299265. eCollection 2021. J Blood Med. 2021. PMID: 34113202 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous