Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;19(2):208-216.
doi: 10.1002/msc.1525. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

Virtual assessments of knee and wrist joint range motion have comparable reliability with face-to-face assessments

Affiliations

Virtual assessments of knee and wrist joint range motion have comparable reliability with face-to-face assessments

Saurabh P Mehta et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: There has been increased usage of virtual telerehabilitation approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial to establish reliability of conducting virtual assessments for musculoskeletal conditions.

Objectives: This research determined the intra- and interrater reliability of measuring knee and wrist range of motion (ROM) assessed virtually and obtained face-to-face (F2F) using a goniometer (UG) for a student and an experienced examiner.

Method: Knee and wrist joint ROM for 54 healthy participants was assessed virtually and F2F by a student examiner and an experienced physical therapist. Intra- (virtual vs. UG assessment) and inter-rater (virtual or UG assessment between examiners) reliabilities were examined for all ROM using Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC values were considered good (>0.75) or excellent (>0.90). Bland and Altman plots determined the limits of agreement (LOA) in assessing joint ROM.

Results/findings: Student examiner had good reliability in virtually estimating knee extension (ICC = 0.79), wrist flexion (ICC = 0.82) and wrist extension (ICC = 0.78), whereas the experienced examiner had excellent reliability in virtually estimating all knee and wrist ROM (ICC > 0.90). The LOA in assessing knee and wrist ROM for the student examiner were wider indicating higher disagreement between virtual and UG-obtained ROM in some cases.

Conclusions: Virtual estimation of knee and wrist ROM is a reliable technique, however experience level impacts the precision of measurement. It is suggested that the same examiner conducts all the ROM assessments throughout the clinical course of a patient receiving virtual interventions for knee or wrist pathologies.

Keywords: knee range of motion; reliability; telerehabilitation; virtual assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brosseau, L., Balmer, S., Tousignant, M., O'Sullivan, J. P., Goudreault, C., Goudreault, M., & Gringras, S. (2001). Intra-and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 82(3), 396-402.
    1. Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: A review. Archives of Orofacial Science, 12(1), 1-11.
    1. Cabana, F., Boissy, P., Tousignant, M., Moffet, H., Corriveau, H., & Dumais, R. (2010). Interrater agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome measurements for total knee arthroplasty. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 16(3), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0106
    1. Carter, T. I., Pansy, B., Wolff, A. L., Hillstrom, H. J., Backus, S. I., Lenhoff, M., & Wolfe, S. W. (2009). Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: A cadaveric study. The Journal of hand surgery, 34(8), 1422-1428.
    1. Clapper, M. P., & Wolf, S. L. (1988). Comparison of the reliability of the Orthoranger and the standard goniometer for assessing active lower extremity range of motion. Physical Therapy, 68(2), 214-218.

LinkOut - more resources