Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude, and Four Nonpharmaceutical Interventions During the Late Period of the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: Online Cross-Sectional Survey of 8158 Adults
- PMID: 33108317
- PMCID: PMC7669364
- DOI: 10.2196/21372
Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude, and Four Nonpharmaceutical Interventions During the Late Period of the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: Online Cross-Sectional Survey of 8158 Adults
Abstract
Background: So far, there have been no published population studies on the relationship between a COVID-19 infection and public risk perception, information source, knowledge, attitude, and behaviors during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Objective: This study aims to understand the relationships between COVID-19 infection; four personal nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs; handwashing, proper coughing habits, social distancing, and mask wearing); and public risk perception, knowledge, attitude, and other social demographic variables.
Methods: An online survey of 8158 Chinese adults between February 22 and March 5, 2020, was conducted. Bivariate associations between categorical variables were examined using Fisher exact test. We also explored the determinants of four NPIs as well as their association with COVID-19 infection using logistic regression.
Results: Of 8158 adults included, 57 (0.73%) were infected with COVID-19. The overwhelming majority of respondents showed a positive attitude (n=8094, 99.2%), positive risk perception (n=8146, 99.9%), and high knowledge levels that were among the strongest predictors of the four adopted NPIs (handwashing: n=7895, 96.8%; proper coughing: 5997/6444, 93.1%; social distancing: n=7104/8158, 87.1%; and mask wearing: 5011/5120, 97.9%). There was an increased risk of COVID-19 infection for those who did not wash their hands (2.28% vs 0.65%; risk ratio [RR] 3.53, 95% CI 1.53-8.15; P=.009), did not practice proper coughing (1.79% vs 0.73%; RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.15-5.15; P=.03), did not practice social distancing (1.52% vs 0.58%; RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.48-4.67; P=.002), and did not wear a mask (7.41% vs 0.6%; RR 12.38, 95% CI 5.81-26.36; P<.001). For those who did practice all other three NPIs, wearing a mask was associated with a significantly reduced risk of infection compared to those who did not wear a mask (0.6% vs 16.7%; P=.04). Similarly, for those who did not practice all or part of the other three NPIs, wearing a mask was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of infection. In a penalized logistic regression model including all four NPIs, wearing a mask was the only significant predictor of COVID-19 infection among the four NPIs (odds ratio 7.20, 95% CI 2.24-23.11; P<.001).
Conclusions: We found high levels of risk perception, positive attitude, desirable knowledge, as well as a high level of adopting the four NPIs. The relevant knowledge, risk perception, and attitude were strong predictors of adapting the four NPIs. Mask wearing, among the four personal NPIs, was the most effective protective measure against COVID-19 infection, with added preventive effect among those who practiced all or part of the other three NPIs.
Keywords: COVID-19; China; NPI; attitude; infection; intervention; knowledge; mask wearing; nonpharmaceutical personal interventions; online survey; public health; risk perception.
©Hong Xu, Yong Gan, Daikun Zheng, Bo Wu, Xian Zhu, Chang Xu, Chenglu Liu, Zhou Tao, Yaoyue Hu, Min Chen, Mingjing Li, Zuxun Lu, Jack Chen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.11.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Public perceptions, individual characteristics, and preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in six countries: a cross-sectional study.Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 3;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00952-2. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021. PMID: 33657995 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and Factors Associated With Risk Perception, Anxiety, and Behavior From the Early Outbreak Period to the Controlled Period of COVID-19 Epidemic: Four Cross-Sectional Online Surveys in China in 2020.Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;9:768867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.768867. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35118042 Free PMC article.
-
High engagement in nonpharmaceutical interventions and their associations with reduced COVID-19 among US college students.BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15916-0. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37237362 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to influence COVID-19 outcomes: A scoping review.Prev Med. 2023 Jul;172:107499. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107499. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Prev Med. 2023. PMID: 37028526 Free PMC article.
-
Nonpharmaceutical public health interventions to curb the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022 Apr 30;16(4):583-591. doi: 10.3855/jidc.14580. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022. PMID: 35544617 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of wearing masks during the COVID-19 outbreak in cohort and case-control studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Jan 5;49(6):e20230003. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230003. eCollection 2024. J Bras Pneumol. 2024. PMID: 38198343 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a COVID-19 rapid antigen testing program among student athletes in a public high school district.Eval Program Plann. 2023 Jun;98:102280. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102280. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Eval Program Plann. 2023. PMID: 36996640 Free PMC article.
-
Absence of short-term changes in knowledge and attitudes among household contacts of COVID-19 cases during the post-acute phase of the pandemic in Catalonia and Navarre, Spain.Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;12:1306284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1306284. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38487191 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Performance Evaluation of Personal Protective Measures and Antiviral Agents Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Narrative Review.Clin Pathol. 2023 Mar 13;16:2632010X231161222. doi: 10.1177/2632010X231161222. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Clin Pathol. 2023. PMID: 36938514 Free PMC article.
-
Development and psychometric assessment of the public health emergency risk perception scale: Under the outbreak of COVID-19.Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Jan 10;8(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 30. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021. PMID: 33520340 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. World Health Organization. 2020. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-re....
-
- COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Johns Hopkins University. 2020. https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594....
-
- Spinney L. Coronavirus vaccine: when will we have one? The Guardian. 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/12/when-will-we-have-a-corona....
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical