A cover flap reduces the rate of fistula after urethroplasty whatever the severity of hypospadias
- PMID: 33108479
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03489-1
A cover flap reduces the rate of fistula after urethroplasty whatever the severity of hypospadias
Abstract
Objective: To determine which patients should benefit from the interposition of a well-vascularized flap between the neourethra and the penile skin and if it should be performed even in mild hypospadias.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study on patients with a primary hypospadias repair was performed (2003-2017). Only patients undergoing urethroplasty based on the principle of a tubularization were selected to ensure comparable groups. Patients were assigned in two groups according to the use or not of a cover flap. Univariate analysis and adjusted logistic regression were used to evaluate the relation between postoperative complications, the severity of hypospadias, the use of flap and patients' characteristics.
Results: Three-hundred and seventy-six patients were included with anterior (59.3%), midshaft (27.4%) and posterior hypospadias (13.3%). The median follow-up was 54 months (24 months-17 years). The overall rate of fistula was 11.7% (n = 44). Comparing the outcome in children with flap (n = 217) to controls (n = 159) showed that the use of a flap reduces the rate of fistula (6.5 vs 18.9%, p < 0.001). Stratification of the study according to the phenotype reveals that the more severe the hypospadias, the more protective was the flap (OR = 2.6 for anterior, 5.5 for midpenile, 7.1 for posterior hypospadias). The flap remains nevertheless significantly effective whatever the phenotype (p < 0.05 for anterior, p = 0.01 for midpenile, p = 0.02 for posterior hypospadias).
Conclusions: The more severe the hypospadias, the more effective is the cover flap to avoid fistula. It remains nevertheless suitable even in anterior hypospadias and the use of a cover flap should not be limited to the surgery of severe phenotypes.
Keywords: Complication; Fistula; Hypospadias; Prognosis; Surgery; Surgical flap.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Schneuer FJ, Holland AJA, Pereira G et al (2015) Prevalence, repairs and complications of hypospadias: an Australian population-based study. Arch Dis Child 100:1038–1043. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308809 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Spinoit A-F, Poelaert F, Van Praet C et al (2015) Grade of hypospadias is the only factor predicting for re-intervention after primary hypospadias repair: a multivariate analysis from a cohort of 474 patients. J PediatrUrol 11:70.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.014 - DOI
-
- Thomas DT, KaradenizCerit K, Yener S et al (2015) The effect of dorsal dartos flaps on complication rates in hypospadias repair: a randomised prospective study. J PediatrUrol 11:23.e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.07.010 - DOI
-
- Liao AY, Smith GH (2016) Urethrocutaneous fistulae after hypospadias repair: When do they occur? J Paediatr Child Health 52:556–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13102 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Guralnick ML, Al-Shammari A, Williot PE, Leonard MP (2000) Outcome of hypospadias repair using the tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty. Can J Urol 7:986–991 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources