Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;31(4):616-626.
doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0167. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

Predicting Outcomes in Sporadic and Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma over Two Decades

Affiliations

Predicting Outcomes in Sporadic and Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma over Two Decades

Anupam Kotwal et al. Thyroid. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Hence, we aimed to identify factors at the time of MTC surgery that predict overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), locoregional recurrence/persistence (LR), and distant metastases (DM). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of clinicopathologic, radiological, and laboratory data in MTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy at Mayo Clinic from January 1995 to December 2015. Results: We identified 163 patients (mean age 48.4 years, 48% males), 102 with sporadic MTC and 61 with hereditary disease (n = 46 multiple endocrine neoplasia [MEN] 2A, n = 3 MEN 2B, n = 12 familial MTC) with a median follow-up time of 5.5 years. On univariate analysis, age >55 years, male sex, DM at the time of surgery (M1), lateral neck lymph node (LN) involvement (N1b), gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 3/4, tumor size (T) 3/4, tumor size, and postoperative calcitonin (Ctn) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significant predictors of worse OS and DSS. On multivariable analysis, both gross ETE (hazard ratio [HR] 4.62, 6.58) and M1 (HR 5.11, 10.45) remained significant predictors of worse OS as well as DSS, while age >55 years (HR 3.21), male sex (HR 2.42), and postoperative Ctn (HR 1.002 for every 100 pg/mL increase) were significant only for worse OS. On univariate analysis, male sex, M1, N1b, gross ETE, stage 3/4, T 3/4, tumor size, number of LNs involved, and postoperative Ctn were significant predictors of LR and DM; age >55 years was additionally significant for DM. On multivariable analysis, gross ETE (HR 3.16, 5.93) and N1b (HR 4.31, 4.64) remained significant predictors of LR and DM; ratio of resected/involved LN (HR 10.91) was additionally predictive for LR and postoperative Ctn (HR 1.003 for every 100 pg/mL increase) for DM. Conclusions: Disease burden at initial surgery, especially gross ETE, lateral neck LN involvement, and DM, as well as the biochemical response to surgery appear to be more important than demographic factors in terms of MTC prognosis. These findings highlight the importance of rigorous perioperative assessment to better predict MTC outcomes.

Keywords: cancer recurrence; metastasis; mortality; survival; thyroid cancer; thyroidectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(a) Overall survival comparing MTC patients with AJCC TNM stages 3 and 4 vs. 1 and 2 (p = 0.0007). (b) Disease-specific survival comparing MTC patients with AJCC TNM stages 3 and 4 vs. 1 and 2 (p = 0.005). AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Overall survival comparing MTC patients with postoperative Ctn >1000 pg/mL vs. 10–5000 pg/mL vs. 0–10 pg/mL (p = 0.008). Ctn, calcitonin.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(a) Disease-specific survival comparing MTC patients with distant metastases (M1) vs. those without distant metastases (M0) at initial surgery (p < 0.0001). (b) Disease-specific survival comparing MTC patients with gross ETE vs. those without gross ETE at initial surgery (p < 0.0001). ETE, extrathyroidal extension.

References

    1. Wells SA Jr., Asa SL, Dralle H, Elisei R, Evans DB, Gagel RF, Lee N, Machens A, Moley JF, Pacini F, Raue F, Frank-Raue K, Robinson B, Rosenthal MS, Santoro M, Schlumberger M, Shah M, Waguespack SG. 2015. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 25:567–610. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH. 2000. Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 88:1139–1148. - PubMed
    1. Modigliani E, Cohen R, Campos JM, Conte-Devolx B, Maes B, Boneu A, Schlumberger M, Bigorgne JC, Dumontier P, Leclerc L, Corcuff B, Guilhem I. 1998. Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma: results in 899 patients. The GETC Study Group. Groupe d'etude des tumeurs a calcitonine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:265–273. - PubMed
    1. Roman S, Lin R, Sosa JA. 2006. Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases. Cancer 107:2134–2142. - PubMed
    1. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. 2017. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67:93–99. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources