Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 27;12(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00699-y.

Trajectories of subjective cognitive decline, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia

Affiliations

Trajectories of subjective cognitive decline, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia

Tau Ming Liew. Alzheimers Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: In cognitively normal individuals, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) has been reported to predict MCI and dementia (MCI/dementia). However, prior studies mostly captured SCD at single time-points without considering the longitudinal course of SCD. This study examined whether the trajectories of SCD provide any added information-beyond one-time assessments of SCD-on the risk of MCI/dementia.

Methods: This cohort study included 5661 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Centers across the USA, who were ≥ 50 years and had normal cognition in the first-four annual visits (year 1 to year 4). The participants were evaluated for SCD in the first-four annual visits (year 1 to year 4), and followed-up almost annually (year 4 up to year 14) for incident MCI/dementia. SCD trajectories (as identified from latent-class-growth-curve-analysis) were included in Cox regression to estimate their risks of MCI/dementia, with analyses further stratified by age (< 75 years versus ≥ 75 years; based on median-split).

Results: Compared to those without SCD (in the first-four annual visits), Intermittent SCD (i.e., reported in 1-2 of the first-four annual visits) predicted a higher risk (HR 1.4) and Persistent SCD (i.e., reported in 3-4 of the first-four annual visits) predicted the highest risk (HR 2.2), with the results remaining significant even after adjusting for baseline SCD. Age-stratified analysis revealed that the risk associated with Intermittent SCD was only present in older individuals, while risk related to Persistent SCD was consistently present across the younger and older age groups. Age compounded the effects of the trajectories, whereby older individuals with Persistent SCD had > 75% probability of developing MCI/dementia by 10 years, in contrast to < 25% probability by 10 years in younger individuals with No SCD.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the utility of SCD trajectories-especially when used in combination with age strata-in identifying high-risk populations for preventive interventions and trials. They also suggest a potential modification in the current SCD criteria, with the inclusion of "persistent SCD over several years" as a feature of SCD plus.

Keywords: Cohort study; Cox regression; Dementia; Mild cognitive impairment; Subjective cognitive complaints; Trajectory; Utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design showing the timeline of analysis. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SCD, subjective cognitive decline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier curves reflecting the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia across the different trajectories of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 5661)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier curves reflecting the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, stratified by different age groups and trajectories of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 5661)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chetelat G, Dubois B, Dufouil C, Ellis KA, van der Flier WM, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(6):844–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill NL, Mogle J, Wion R, Munoz E, DePasquale N, Yevchak AM, Parisi JM. Subjective cognitive impairment and affective symptoms: a systematic review. Gerontologist. 2016;56(6):e109–e127. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw091. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liew TM. Depression, subjective cognitive decline, and the risk of neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0527-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell AJ. Is it time to separate subjective cognitive complaints from the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment? Age Ageing. 2008;37(5):497–499. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh-Manoux A, Dugravot A, Ankri J, Nabi H, Berr C, Goldberg M, Zins M, Kivimaki M, Elbaz A. Subjective cognitive complaints and mortality: does the type of complaint matter? J Psychiatr Res. 2014;48(1):73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.10.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types