Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):e039321.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039321.

Impact of involving people with dementia and their care partners in research: a qualitative study

Jahanara Miah  1   2 , Suzanne Parsons  2 , Karina Lovell  3 , Bella Starling  2 , Iracema Leroi  4   1 , Piers Dawes  5   6
Affiliations

Impact of involving people with dementia and their care partners in research: a qualitative study

Jahanara Miah et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) at each stage of the research cycle in a dementia research programme.

Design: We used monitoring forms to record the impact of the research programme's PPI at different stages of research and qualitative interviews with all participants to evaluate the impact of PPI.

Setting: We evaluated Research User Groups (RUGs-older people with dementia and care partners) which were established to provide PPI support for the research programme in multiple European sites.

Participants: We purposively sampled RUG members (n=34) and researchers (n=13) who had participated in PPI activities. Inclusion criteria for the study were: (a) RUG members who had participated in the research awareness training and in PPI activities and had the capacity to consent; (b) researchers who involved RUGs in their work.

Results: Impact on the research: changes to the study conduct were made as a result of the feedback from RUGs. These included prioritisation of clinical recommendations, the wording of study information and recruitment materials, the content and layout of the user interface for a computerised memory test, interpretation of intervention results and advice on dissemination avenues. Impact on RUG members: they reported that involvement had given them a sense of purpose and satisfaction. Their perception of health research changed from being an exclusive activity to one, which lay people, could have meaningful involvement. Impact on researchers: PPI was a new way of working and interacting with PPI members had given them insight into the impact of their work on people living with dementia.

Conclusions: PPI can have a substantial impact on dementia research and the people involved in the research. To justify the time and expense of PPI, the advantageous practical impacts of PPI should be systematically recorded and consistently reported.

Keywords: dementia; public health; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SENSE-Cog work package aims. Overview of SENSE-Cog research programme investigating the combined impact of ageing-related hearing and vision impairment on mental well-being with a dedicated work package on patient public involvement embedded as a cross-cutting theme.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SENSE-Cog patient and public involvement (PPI) model of working: monitoring and evaluation. PPI model of working in monitoring and evaluation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tinetti ME, Basch E. Patients’ responsibility to participate in decision making and research. JAMA 2013;309:2331–2. 10.1001/jama.2013.5592 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deane KHO, Flaherty H, Daley DJ, et al. . Priority setting partnership to identify the top 10 research priorities for the management of Parkinson’s disease. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006434 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006434 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, et al. . Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: a position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2017;4:e1. 10.2196/rehab.6376 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mockford C, Murray M, Seers K, et al. . A shared study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges. Res Involv Engagem 2016;2:8. 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollard KC, Evans D. Theorising service user involvement from a researcher perspective : Staddon P, Mental health service users in research. Bristol: Policy Press, 2013.

Publication types