Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):439-446.
doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_73_19.

Fluid responsiveness to passive leg raising in patients with and without coronary artery disease: A prospective observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Fluid responsiveness to passive leg raising in patients with and without coronary artery disease: A prospective observational study

Varun Suresh et al. Ann Card Anaesth. 2020 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Hemodynamic stability and fluid responsiveness (FR) assume importance in perioperative management of patients undergoing major surgery. Passive leg raising (PLR) is validated in assessing FR in intensive care unit patients. Very few studies have examined FR to PLR in intraoperative scenario. We prospectively studied FR to PLR using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), in patients with no coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing major neurosurgery and those with CAD undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: We enrolled 29 adult consenting patients undergoing major neurosurgery with TEE monitoring and 25 patients undergoing CABG. After induction of anesthesia, baseline hemodynamic parameters were obtained which was followed by PLR using automated adjustment of the operating table. Clinical and TEE-derived hemodynamic parameters were recorded at 1 and 10 min after PLR following which patients were returned to supine position.

Results: A total of 162 TEE and clinical examinations were done across baseline, 1 and 10 min after PLR; and paired comparison was done at data intervals of baseline versus 1 min PLR, baseline versus 10 min PLR, and 1 min versus 10 min PLR. There was no significant change in hemodynamic variables at any of the paired comparison intervals in patients undergoing neurosurgery. CABG cases had significant hemodynamic improvement 1 min after PLR, partially sustained at 10 min.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing CABG had significant hemodynamic response to PLR, whereas non-CAD patients undergoing neurosurgery did not. A blood pressure-left ventricular end-diastolic volume combination represented strong correlation in response prediction (Pearson's coefficient 0.641; P < 0.01).

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; fluid responsiveness; passive leg raising; transesophageal echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Comparison of area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves at significant paired comparison intervals of clinical variables, for coronary artery disease (group 2) cases. [SBP: Systolic BP; DBP max: Diastolic BP (maximum); PP: Pulse pressure; SPV: Systolic pressure variability; PPV: Pulse pressure variability; PLR: Passive leg raising]. (b) Comparison of area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves at significant paired comparison intervals of echocardiographic variables, for coronary artery disease (group 2) cases. [CI: Cardiac index; SV: Stroke volume; SVV: Stroke volume variability; VTI: Velocity time integral; LVEDV: Left ventricular end diastolic volume; SVC max: Diameter of superior vena cava (maximum); PLR: Passive leg raising]. Note: Cardiac output and cardiac index had the same AUROC

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aditianingsih D, George YW. Guiding principles of fluid and volume therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:249–60. - PubMed
    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77. - PubMed
    1. Andre AS, DelRossi AL. Hemodynamic management of patients in the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2082–93. - PubMed
    1. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Beale R, Pfeiffer UJ. Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload. J Crit Care. 1996;11:180–8. - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Kuschner WG, Lighthall G. Perioperative intravascular fluid assessment and monitoring: A narrative review of established and emerging techniques. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011. 2011:231493. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types