Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 27;11(1):5427.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7.

Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy

Affiliations
Review

Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy

W Amelung et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Sustainable soil carbon sequestration practices need to be rapidly scaled up and implemented to contribute to climate change mitigation. We highlight that the major potential for carbon sequestration is in cropland soils, especially those with large yield gaps and/or large historic soil organic carbon losses. The implementation of soil carbon sequestration measures requires a diverse set of options, each adapted to local soil conditions and management opportunities, and accounting for site-specific trade-offs. We propose the establishment of a soil information system containing localised information on soil group, degradation status, crop yield gap, and the associated carbon-sequestration potentials, as well as the provision of incentives and policies to translate management options into region- and soil-specific practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Conceptualization of C sequestration potentials in arable land.
Usually C is lost after land-use conversion from native ecosystems (e.g., peatlands, forests, grasslands) to arable land. Future C storage in agricultural fields then depends on agricultural management practices, with options to regain C by increasing the organic matter input relative to ongoing CO2 release at best management practice options (BMP), to maintain C stocks by continued good agricultural practice (GAP), or to lose additional C by intensifying agriculture without additional C input, usually followed by soil degradation.

References

    1. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget (2019). Earth Syst. Sci. Data11, 1783–1838 (2019).
    1. Anderson CM, et al. Natural climate solutions are not enough. Science. 2019;363:933–934. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuss S, et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018;13:063002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f. - DOI
    1. IPCC (2019): Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/11/SRCCL-Full-Report-Compil....
    1. Rumpel C, et al. Put more carbon in soils to meet Paris climate pledges. Nature. 2018;564:32–34. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07587-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types