Disparity among Endocrinologists and Gynaecologists in the Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- PMID: 33110648
- PMCID: PMC7574802
- DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.012
Disparity among Endocrinologists and Gynaecologists in the Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare endocrinologists' versus gynaecologists' approaches in using the Rotterdam criteria to diagnose polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Physiology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between December 2017 and April 2018. A validated self-administered questionnaire in English was used to obtain information from endocrinologists and gynaecologists regarding their approaches to diagnosing PCOS. Each group's diagnostic use of the Rotterdam criteria, association between years of experience and clinical decision-making, clinical features leading to diagnosis and considerations in the diagnosis of biochemical parameters that define hyperandrogenism were evaluated.
Results: A total of 132 physicians were included in this study (response rate: 27%); 77 (58.3%) were endocrinologists and 55 (41.7%) were gynaecologists. Most of the respondents (79.5%) had ≤20 years of experience. A statistically significant difference was detected between the endocrinologists and gynaecologists (98.7% versus 81.8%; P = 0.001) in their consideration of hyperandrogenism in the diagnosis. The gynaecologists relied more on ovarian morphology than the endocrinologists did (76.4% versus 45.5%, P <0.0001). Physicians with more experience used ovarian ultrasonography more compared to those with less experience (P = 0.006).
Conclusion: There was disparity in the diagnostic approaches of endocrinologists, who rely more on androgen levels for diagnosis of PCOS versus gynaecologists, who more frequently use an ovarian morphology assessment. Increased years of experience increased the rate of ultrasonography use for PCOS diagnosis in both groups.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Endocrinology; Gynecology; Healthcare Disparities; Hirsutism; Hyperandrogenism; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Saudi Arabia.
© Copyright 2020, Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Sivayoganathan D, Maruthini D, Glanville JM, Balen AH. Full investigation of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) presenting to four different clinical specialties reveals significant differences and undiagnosed morbidity. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2011;14:261–5. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2011.632058. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, Carmina E, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Androgen Excess and PCOS Society disease state clinical review: Guide to the best practices in the evaluation and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome--Part 1. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1291–300. doi: 10.4158/EP15748.DSC. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous